Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

North-east could support 34,000 jobs in key clean sectors – report

Offshore wind turbine blades on a hoist
Turbine blades for the Neart na Gaoithe offshore wind farm arriving at Port of Dundee. Image: Forth Ports

New analysis finds that that Aberdeen city and shire could support 33,800 “clean” jobs in key transition sectors within ten years, but urges government to support policies that will benefit local communities and workers.

The analysis, commissioned by campaign group Platform and prepared by Transition Economics, examines the potential for clean job creation across four regions rich in oil and gas-related skills, including Aberdeen city and shire, Fife and Tayside, Tyneside and Teesside.

All have significant employment within oil and gas and the wider supply chain – including residents who travel to work offshore – offering a pathway for those looking to move into new roles as part of a wider “just transition”.

The report estimates that the north-east could support 24,500-33,800 jobs in several key “clean” sectors, with a similar range offered by Fife and Tayside (up to 34,200) – and campaigners have now called on policymakers to “get on with it.”

Boosting local content

The report examined the possibilities of a host of clean energy-related technologies, from wave energy to EV charging and transmission networks, but settled on three key sectors which have the greatest job-creating potential: domestic energy efficiency retrofits; offshore wind and hydrogen electrolyser manufacture and services.

The north-east stands to gain the most from offshore wind and its supply chain, which could together support around 13,900 jobs in the region by 2032 – around 10% of the UK total.

Echoing longstanding complaints from unions, Platform notes that despite the UK’s rapid deployment of the technology over the past decade, “job creation has not met expectations and promises” as construction and manufacturing benefits have largely gone overseas.

“If existing public investment is scaled up to boost domestic content, then significantly more manufacturing jobs will be located within these regions,” the report adds. “Policy-makers can learn from the lacklustre job creation in the early years, and capture the full jobs benefits of the massive offshore wind roll-out that is coming.”

More than 17,000 jobs would also be supported by retrofitting and upgrading more than 200,000 homes in the north-east to improve efficiency via, for example, better insulation, windows and heating systems.

Finally, it finds that up to 2,500 jobs could be supported by an electrolyser manufacturing industry, which would also provide equipment and skills for export – or around 10% of whole UK sector, according to data from the Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult.

The point is a timely one. As in the case offshore wind, many have already questioned how the much-hyped hydrogen sector will be possible without the establishment of more local manufacturers for the technology.

Worker looks out over the yard at BiFab in Methil

Just transition

It should be noted that in this case researchers focused on the impact of “community-wide job creation” – meaning its latest analysis does not quantify the potential for current offshore oil and gas workers to transition into new clean jobs, including the skills and qualification requirements, pay scales, job conditions or transition pathways.

It does however chime roughly with work prepared by RGU earlier this year, which found that £17bn of renewables investment and activity over the next eight years could secure 54,000 direct and indirect jobs in the north-east by 2030 – up from 45,000 today.

However, the same report also found that a less ambitious scenario without vital investment could see up to 17,000 jobs at risk, with workforce numbers falling by up to 40% to 28,000 over the same period.

RMT Union organiser and ex-oil rig worker Jake Molloy welcomed the latest findings.

“This research shows that it is possible to phase out oil and gas in a way that doesn’t leave whole communities at risk, and now we need politicians to get on with it,” he said.

“Any talk of a just transition will mean nothing if the offshore oil and gas workers aren’t supported in the move to renewables.

“As we phase out North Sea oil and gas, we need to see protections in place for workers – job guarantees, skills transfers and vastly improved conditions.

“As it currently stands, workers are finding it difficult to gain jobs in the offshore wind sector due to obstructive training standards bodies, whilst being subject to rapidly worsening conditions in terms of pay, safety and job security in offshore oil and gas.”

Message must be heard

While Platform says some roles will be “necessarily created” a wider transition to a zero-carbon economy, it urges for strong policy support, adding that jobs should “decent and secure”, be available and accessible to residents, offer fair pay, upskilling opportunities and good health and safety practices – all of which “requires the right policy mix on the part of government.”

Platform’s just transition advocacy campaigner Rosemary Harris warned of the consequences if the message was not heeded.

“Continued oil and gas extraction is bad for workers and bad for the climate,” she added.

“We urgently need to scale up alternatives and enable workers in high carbon industries to transition to renewables. Simply clinging on to the fossil fuels of the past isn’t enough, and only serves to harm workers who could end up stranded in these industries as they are phased out.”

Conversation