Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘Waste of £28 million’: Union Terrace Gardens critics pile on social media post

Union Terrace Gardens in Aberdeen
The newly opened Union Terrace Gardens was subject of vociferous debate on social media. Image: Kami Thomson/ DC Thomson

An Aberdeen marketing executive stirred up strong feelings on social media after he posted his critical view on the city’s Union Terrace Gardens.

David Stokes, a marketing manager for an Aberdeen chemicals firm, has received more than 100,000 “impressions” on his post which said the development was a “waste of £28 million” and that it “looks worse than it previously did”.

Several commentators agreed with his sentiments and shared their own.

Louise Wood, managing director of recruitment firm Prodrill Energy Resource Solutions, added: “Underwhelmed is an understatement.”

Like many on the post, she also suggested that previous plans led by Sir Ian Wood would have been better.

Previous ideas on how Union Terrace Gardens could look which were rejected. Image: Wood Group

His controversial proposals were backed with a pledge of £50 million but the plan was overturned by the Labour-led city council in 2012.

“Another massive disappointment from ACC (Aberdeen City Council),” she wrote. “Sir Ian Wood will no doubt be shaking his head at this… sorry the ACC could not see your vision.”

Katrine Dunbar, who runs Dunbar Events and Marketing, also harkened back to the previous plans adding that she had worked on the campaign at the time with a previous employer.

“£50 million from Sir Ian committed years ago for a lovely green space which the council threw out despite the public vote and this is what we end up with!” she wrote.

Money used for something else?

Subsea engineer Graham Penman added he “totally” agreed with Mr Stokes pondering other uses of the budget.

“My reaction to seeing it was of a similar take. It’ll be interesting to see how it looks in 12 months. £28m would have been far better spent on appropriate housing for those in need,” he posted.

Tinto Architecture founder Richard Tinto who recently spoke at the emergency summit to discuss ways to save Aberdeen’s Union Street expects UTG will look ‘stunning’ come summertime. Image: Kenny Elrick/DC Thomson

However, not all of the 184 commentators were down on the new look UTG.

Architect boss Richard Tinto said the space would greatly improve in coming months and could kickstart the regeneration of the city centre.

“I think it will be absolutely stunning in the summer and as an accessible space for all a mark of what the gardens should be.

“It has been completed in unprecedented times and whilst there have been challenges I would like to see it used as a springboard for the regeneration of the city.”

Likewise social media manager and recent TEDxAberdeen speaker Katie Forbes hit a positive note.

WATCH: Ms Forbes’ TedX Aberdeen talk

She wrote: “Once the flowers bloom in spring, I think the gardens will look spectacular. If I was to compare this to Edinburgh’s Princes St Gardens, I would say UTG wins hands down for both design and accessibility.

“And let’s not forget, whether people are loving or hating the design, it’s attracting more people to the city centre, which can only be seen as a positive.”

Aberdeen marketing executive David Stokes stirred up opinion with his post. Image: David Stokes

Mr Stokes said: “I’m quite surprised with at the volume of responses, mostly in agreement, with many mentioning transparency as to where the money was spent.”

Conversation