Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Highland battery project faces backlash over fire and pollution fears

Picture shows: Left Anesco battery storage site & Swordale Hill near Evanton, Ross-shire.Image:  Anesco / Douglas Scott / HEMEDIA
Picture shows: Left Anesco battery storage site & Swordale Hill near Evanton, Ross-shire.Image: Anesco / Douglas Scott / HEMEDIA

Fears over fire and pollution are being raised by a Highland community as developers plan a large battery project in Easter Ross.

Local residents have hit out over a lack of answers from developer Fig Power – a part of UK engineering group Hydrock – over a planned project at Swordale, near Evanton, comprising up to 20 battery container units.

While battery fires are rare, the 49.9-megawatt scheme is more than twice the capacity of an Orsted battery storage scheme in Liverpool which took first responders nearly 60 hours to bring under control when an explosion and blaze engulfed it in 2020.

Swordale resident Rachael Bews, highlighted that despite the rarity, even one occurrence could place huge pressure on the remote community.

“There’s only one full-time fire unit in the area so the logistical challenges of putting out a fire at a unit like this here could be really challenging because of where we’re located,” she said.

“I do really understand the need for these innovations and I have no issue with them being here. It just seems from what I’ve read that there aren’t enough contingency plans in place to protect the environment if things do go wrong.”

‘Comprehensive’ appraisal

Ms Bews and others are keen to understand what precautions would be put in place – particularly in a village with single-track road access.

Fig Power had no comment when asked by Press and Journal sister website Energy Voice about residents’ concerns.

A presentation available via the company’s website says the development will not lead to a detrimental loss of agricultural land, and that the site will be screened to protect and enhance the visual impact, as well as providing “much needed tree planting”.

Fig also said a “comprehensive heritage appraisal” was undertaken in summer 2022 in which “no issues” were raised.

The site, including inverters and transformers will be linked to a substation at Fyrish, near Alness via a new three-mile buried cable.

Pollution fears

The developer says the scheme will be built on a flood-free zone, though another Swordale resident who lives near the proposed site and wished to remain anonymous said he was more concerned about the potential for pollution should any incident occur.

“If those batteries fail and you need thousands of gallons to cool it…the water will be contaminated,” he said, noting that any fluid used would be almost impossible to contain and could then drain into surrounding water courses.

Site plan for battery project at Swordale.

Both also flagged the potential noise pollution from systems used to cool the units.

“I’ve been in engineering all my life – there’s nothing that moves air quietly. The moment a fan is turning it’s not quiet. We have peace and quiet up here, it’s a brilliant place to stay, and the noise pollution from that will not be good,” he added.

He questioned why the facility could not be located closer to existing infrastructure at the Fyrish substation.

Proponents of the site reportedly suggested it could help provide residents with electricity in the event of a power cut – a not uncommon occurrence in rural Easter Ross.

However, Ms Bews dismissed the idea as “nonsensical”, given that most outages are caused by trees falling on overhead lines – something a local battery connection is unlikely to prevent.

Planning permissions

The Swordale project highlights the potential backlash against a wave of similar projects across Scotland and the UK, as Britain becomes more reliant on intermittent renewable energy sources.

This is, in part, due to the nature of the planning framework. In Scotland, energy storage sites remain classed as “generating stations” – and as such any scheme greater than 50MW requires clearance from ministers.

Sites below this threshold – including the proposed development near Evanton – only require approval from local planning authorities.

A similar system applies in England and Wales, though a 2020 revision to planning laws means batteries above 50MW in England and 350MW in Wales may now proceed without national planning approval.

Further changes could still be made. Conservative MP Maria Miller is currently pushing forward a bill that would see industrial lithium-ion battery sites categorised as “hazardous”, so that the Environment Agency, the Health and Safety Executive and the fire and rescue services would be statutory consultees when planning applications are considered.

However, with curtailment payments to wind farms now totalling some £900m since 2017, more storage capacity and infrastructure will inevitably be needed.

Community meeting planned

In Swordale, the community may find itself at the sharp end of these debates.

Ms Bews said most people had learned of the proposals via “a tiny note through the door” in early January.

The flyer highlighted key details for the project and the hosting of two public meetings, with any public comments to be filed ahead of a March 3 deadline.

“Having spoken to some of the other residents, that is quite a short time frame for people to become clued up enough on what it is they’re proposing and to get fair and balanced information,” she said.

At least 40 people are expected to attend a community-organised meeting in the village hall this week, as “quite a large number of people I think have concerns about it,” she added.

Further consultation

Fig Power and its agents intend to hold a further public consultation meeting on the afternoon of 23 February 2023 at VDJ Hall in Evanton, during which residents can ask questions.

The earliest date for the formal submission of documents is 3 March 2023, though the developer said residents will have another opportunity to comment once a planning process is initiated with Highland Council.

Yet unless local concerns can be allayed, the project may not find a groundswell of support.

“To me this is a no-goer,” one local said.

“I don’t care how many they’re going to build, they’re only going to cause grief.”

Conversation