Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

North Sea in ‘last year of major spending’ as Labour windfall tax beckons

Business leaders have condemned it as a “betrayal” just three months after Keir Starmer visited Aberdeen.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer.
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer.

2024 has been presaged as the final year for major spending in the North Sea oil and gas industry, as Labour windfall tax plans will see a “best-case scenario” of 20,000 jobs lost.

Under a “worst-case scenario” investment bank Stifel said 100,000 jobs could be lost – but highlighted that would need Labour to commit to no new drilling of any kind, which it has not yet done.

It estimates a cumulative loss of £40bn of investment by the mid-2030s under the plans, which would hike and extend the duration of the levy while turning off investment allowances if Labour wins power at the general election.

Business leaders have condemned it as a “betrayal” just three months after Keir Starmer visited Aberdeen promising there would be no “cliff-edge” to the oil and gas industry.

Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce (AGCC) policy director Ryan Crighton said: “To put the devastating job toll in context, it was the axing of 20,000 jobs which sparked the miners’ strikes in 1984-85. This one policy will potentially wipe out five times as many.”

windfall tax labour
20,000 jobs were lost in the 1980s leading to the miners’ strike.

Chris Wheaton, Stifel managing director for oil and gas, said: “If we try and focus on the investment we can see, everything I’m hearing is that 2024 is going to be the last year of major spending in the UK North Sea because of concerns over where the tax structure might be 2025-onwards and you can see that from a number of things companies have said like Harbour Energy, Apache and TotalEnergies.”

Consequences for jobs, investment, tax, energy security and the planet

Mr Wheaton warned that the industry is not an “infinite source of revenue” for the exchequer, and there will be consequences on investment, jobs, and energy security if the Labour windfall tax plans come into action.

Ultimately, Stifel estimates that the Treasury would be £20bn worse-off over the existing life of North Sea fields, and the UK would be importing 80% of its gas supply as early as 2030.

Importing that gas – most likely US LNG – would consequently mean an additional 35 million tonnes of CO2 would be emitted by 2035.

labour windfall tax
Tens of thousands of jobs are expected to be lost as companies pull investment.

Huge uncertainty looms over the extent of the investment and jobs cut, and the outcome will depend on the extent to which companies have desire to invest in the UK.

Mr Wheaton said: “The best case would be driven by no step-change in tax, managed decline of the existing energy mix i.e., the UK’s oil and gas, and also continued incentives to invest in wind, electrification and maybe hydrogen and CCS.

“The worst case would be aggressively going after the offshore industry for additional tax revenues because you think it’s an infinite source of revenue with no downsides at all, and that’s not the case because there are going to be downsides into investment, jobs and energy security.

“The worst case actually would be no new drilling at all. Not just exploration, but any kind of new developments – you can drill out existing licences but then that’s it – that kind of regulatory intervention would be the worst possible case scenario.”

Not quite on par with Norway

labour windfall tax
Stifel oil and gas managing director Chris Wheaton.

Labour said hiking the rate to 78% would align with Norway – but firms would actually be worse off than the UK’s North Sea neighbours.

Average costs –  capex and opex – in the UK is £23 ($30) per barrel,  double that of Norway at £12 ($15), according to Stifel.

“Your return on investments is a lot lower than Norway, and that’s what makes the UK suddenly uncompetitive against other parts of the world,” said Mr Wheaton.

“That then drives the question of jobs, because if you aren’t competitive, you won’t get investment and that means jobs will fall.”

Labour has been contacted for comment.

Scenarios

Trade body Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) said last week that 42,000 jobs are expected to be lost due to the policy package from Labour, with investment being “wiped out” through the loss of £26bn of economic value.

The differing scenarios are partly down to a lack of detail from Labour – the difference between ending exploration drilling and ending infill drilling, for example – on the plans ahead.

Last year the Robert Gordon University said an accelerated production decline would see 60,000 jobs lost by 2030.

Labour windfall tax betrayal

Mr Crighton of the AGCC said: “If you wind down the North Sea too quickly, before jobs and opportunities are available at scale in the renewables sector, then you lose the world class workforce and supply chain.

AGCC’s Ryan Crighton

“That will make what is already an enormous challenge even harder, perhaps impossible. We cannot allow that to happen.”

He added: “If Labour wants to win power, the party needs to prove to industry – and the public – that it can be trusted with our energy transition. The early signs are not good, and if we get this wrong the economic and social damage will be enormous.”