Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

House of Lords committee told of farmers’ reliance on subsidies

Single Application Forms must be submitted by May 15.
Single Application Forms must be submitted by May 15.

The rug of farm subsidies cannot be pulled from under the feet of UK farmers post-Brexit because the British industry is simply too reliant on support, a House of Lords inquiry has been told.

Providing evidence to the EU Energy and Environment Sub-Committee on the implications of Brexit on agriculture, Tim Breitmeyer, the deputy president of the Country Land and Business Association, said funding has to be considered one of the principal challenges for the Government as the agricultural and rural economies move forwards.

“We have to accept the fact that we have lived off a subsidy system for the last 40 years, which was not of our making, but which provides income support,” commented Mr Breitmeyer, a former farm business consultant and arable farmer from East Anglia.

“If you look at the bare facts of the UK’s Total Income from Farming (TIFF), British agriculture would not have been profitable at all over the last 20 years without it [subsidies].

“That, in a time of austerity and at a time when public funds are going to be short, is going to be a real challenge.”

But, despite this inevitable pressure, both Mr Breitmeyer and George Dunn, the chief executive of the Tenant Farmers Association, who also spoke to the committee, stressed Brexit provided a unique opportunity for the UK to have a more tailored and perhaps more relevant food and farming policy.

Mr Dunn said there was also a need to develop a scheme to produce more domestic labour – 85,000 migrant workers were required by industry last year.

He said: “We cannot simply turn off the tap to the EU labour that we have been used to and so heavily reliant on to date but labour supply remains a big concern.”

Mr Dunn also told the committee Brexit would facilitate the creation of agricultural policy that “better fits” but which would also be able to establish a “new consensus”.

This consensus, he said, could reach beyond the internal workings of farming policies to tie in better with external agendas on topics such as animal health, the environment and our place in the wider world in terms of aid and trade.

He said government also had to utilise Brexit as a tool to support the ‘British Brand’, specifically in terms of food and food standards.

Using the Red Tractor scheme as a prime example, he said not only should the Government seek to protect the high standards maintained by UK food producers, but to safeguard the industry.

Public service procurement was a key area, he felt, where the UK should look to become centric on our own food supply chain post-Brexit.