Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

NZ farmers say they want to see emissions cut

Post Thumbnail

The majority of farmers in New Zealand (NZ) believe agriculture should be taking steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) but, at the same time, most admit they don’t know the current emission rates for their own farms or what to do about them.

Fresh insights into on-farm confusion over GHG levels and management is revealed in a new report by the Biological Emissions Reference Group (Berg), an NZ-based initiative backed by agricultural organisations and several government agencies.

Similar to farmers in Scotland, livestock producers in NZ face the challenge of continuing to produce meat alongside a national drive towards ever-reducing GHG targets.

NZ’s current 2030 target, for example, is to reduce GHG emissions by 30%, from 2005 levels.

Proposals are also being discussed for the introduction of a Zero Carbon Bill, set implementation by 2050.

This chimes with the publication in May this year of Scotland’s Climate Change Bill, which included proposals for net zero GHG emissions in the future, a prospect which Jim McLaren, Quality Meat Scotland chairman at the time, warned would make livestock farming in Scotland unviable.

In seeking to assess the same threat in NZ, the new Berg report revealed that 64% of farmers believe agriculture should reduce GHG emissions to help combat climate change.

It also showed, however, that 98% of those questioned do not know the GHG emission rates of their own farms.

In addition, 42% of farmers said they were not aware of how to reduce emissions from agriculture, other than by planting trees.

The report said: “Modelling suggests that if there was widespread adoption of currently available mitigation options, mainly changing farm management practices, up to about a 10% reduction in absolute biological emissions from pasture-based livestock is possible.”