Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

MSPs to look at stiffer penalties for dog attacks

The NFUS says penalty levels are not enough deterrent to stop people allowing dogs to attack livestock.
The NFUS says penalty levels are not enough deterrent to stop people allowing dogs to attack livestock.

A Holyrood committee has issued a call for evidence on proposals to introduce fines of up to £5,000 or six months’ imprisonment for people who fail to stop their dogs attacking livestock.

The Rural Economy and Connectivity (REC) committee is seeking views on a member’s bill put forward by South Scotland MSP Emma Harper.

The bill, which aims to strengthen and update the law in relation to livestock worrying, would extend the livestock worrying offence to cover additional types of farm animal, and rename the offence as that of “attacking or worrying livestock”.

The maximum penalty would be increased to a fine of £5,000 or six months’ imprisonment, and courts would be given powers to ban a convicted person from owning a dog or allowing their dog to go on agricultural land.

It would also give the police greater powers to investigate and enforce a livestock worrying offence, including being able to go on to land to identify a dog, seize it and collect evidence from it.

“Dog attacks cause suffering to farm animals, resulting in distress and significant financial cost to farmers,” said REC committee convener, Edward Mountain MSP.

“Emma Harper believes the current law in relation to livestock worrying is out of date and that tougher enforcement powers and penalties are needed to act as a deterrent.

“The purpose of the committee’s call for evidence is to understand the need for further legislation in this area and to seek views on whether the additional powers and increased punishments proposed are sufficient and proportionate.”

Farm leaders have backed Ms Harper’s bill and NFU Scotland (NFUS) says the current penalty levels have not acted as enough of a deterrent to prevent people allowing their dogs to attack livestock.

The call for evidence is open until August 28, and any views can be submitted to rec.committee@parliament.scot