Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Stephen Young: Clarity on agricultural policies must be a focus

Preparing for the year ahead requires a clear framework from policymakers for farmers to work with.
Preparing for the year ahead requires a clear framework from policymakers for farmers to work with.

Agriculture has always been seen as a steady occupation, however it does have its fair share of ups and downs.

I don’t think any of us are involved in the industry for fame and fortune, rather because we believe in the industry and the work it does to produce food, and care for the natural environment and because we are passionate about it.

This comes in handy when there is currently very little fortune and not so much fame to be had!

I can’t remember a time in my life when agriculture wasn’t seeming to go through some form of transition – although the current situation trumps almost all to have gone before it.

We have recently heard a lot of commentary which appears to play off food production against caring for the environment, where certain land use is deemed acceptable or positive but others are not. It is often nuanced in its thinking without the understanding of the nuance.

For example, “factory farming” is terrible (I still haven’t seen this defined anywhere), yet “family farms” have a positive role. Tourism is good for the economy, but country sports (or blood sports) aren’t.

The pejorative terms provide little help when it comes to understanding the true impact, positive or negative, of an activity.

Similarly we have seen food production pitted against the environment in recent publications, including the Climate Change Committee which suggests a reduction of output from UK agriculture and more land being used to produce energy crops.

Again the full implications need to be fully understood – energy crops are a good source of renewable energy, but that can’t be at the expense of soil quality and carbon storage within it.

Similarly reducing food production in the UK for climate reasons is futile if we happily import from countries with lower or unknown production standards.

The conversation around net-zero feels overly simplistic and difficult to make properly informed decisions on the basis of a single metric.

A recent motion to declare a “Nature Emergency” in the Scottish Parliament was unsuccessful, however it does point out there are far wider implications which require to be understood and addressed very soon.

In early 2021 attention will turn to the Scottish Government’s Third Land Use Strategy, which with a consultation which closes on January 17, does appear to take into account and try to join up many of these competing issues.

The shape and composition of Regional Land Use Partnerships should also become clearer at the start of 2021.

It was a clear recommendation from the Scottish Land Commission that there must be representation at all levels of people with experience of land management, and it is vital that this voice is heard and can have an influence on decisions which will impact on all of rural Scotland.

In terms of agricultural policy direction, we hope the sector doesn’t have to wait much longer to see the Scottish Government’s post-Common Agricultural Policy (Cap) vision.

The publication of the Suckler Beef Climate Group Report as well as other groups for arable, to be led by Andrew Moir, and dairy, will provide a glimpse at the many opportunities available for farmers to reduce emissions whilst maintaining or boosting productivity.

I hope the long-awaited Farming and Food Production Future Policy Group report not only arrives soon but provides Government with the confidence that the sector is both able and willing to tackle emissions and biodiversity loss.

With all of these groups, and others already in place reporting, there will certainly be no shortage of evidence and opinions.

  • Stephen Young is head of policy at Scottish Land and Estates.