Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Paul Richardson: Change is here and more needed to secure future

ENVIRONMENTAL DEMANDS: Rules are tightening on slurry spreading to cut emissions and protect water supply.

Change has been a long-held watchword when looking at the need to build a positive and sustainable future for Scottish farming over the next decade and beyond.

Whilst there remains an urgent need for farming businesses to learn what will replace the Common Agricultural Policy, we are at least seeing some change in the offing as the sector works to improve its environmental footprint.

Transformation

Two announcements from the Scottish Government have shown movement, with the whole of the current year’s agriculture transformation fund of £5million being made available for farm businesses, including agricultural contractors, to invest in capital items to improve slurry management (including covers) in order to reduce emissions and impacts on water quality.

This was followed at the start of March by initial details of the national test programme (NTP), designed to follow a twin track approach of enhancing environmental awareness and knowledge while establishing improved tools to measure performance as part of future public support.

Whilst these are incremental steps rather than the “big ticket” policies we are waiting for, it remains important for the sector to engage and consider how businesses can access both initiatives.

A scheme similar to the agriculture transformation fund was first proposed by the Climate Emergency Response Group (CERG) in 2019, where Scottish Land and Estates represents the land-based sector, as we felt it was vital to overcome barriers to change, most notably cashflow and high capital costs.

Detail

It is important businesses look at the detail of the scheme once available and leave themselves sufficient time to apply, especially as we move into spring.

We expect there will be some conditionality when claiming for the capital items, and it is likely businesses will have to complete a carbon audit and have a nutrient management plan in place.

The NTP was already known about by the sector but the government’s announcement did at least confirm it would get under way soon using the twin track approach outlined above.

It was broadly what Scottish Land and Estates has been calling for, but there will need to be additional details  soon, particularly on track 2, so farming businesses can take the measures required that will ensure their environmental performance develops ahead of a future public support package coming into force.

Commitment

The Scottish Government also acknowledged its commitment to supporting active farming and food production with direct payments while encouraging outcomes that restore nature, benefit our natural capital and promote the natural economy.

This is to be welcomed, as is the recognition government needs to do more with more urgency and balance the needs of the whole industry.

High energy prices forced some fertiliser plants to close last year and inputs have risen again since the war in Ukraine.

At a time where the world is in flux and farming cannot be shielded from steep costs arising from high energy and fertiliser prices, the need to plan ahead for long-term change has never been greater.

Scotland’s farming sector is vital in ensuring food security  and that is why the lack of visible progress on the development of a CAP replacement has been such a concern for the sector.

Engagement

We have requested a greater level of engagement from the Agriculture Reform Implementation Oversight Board (ARIOB) with industry stakeholders and we hope we will see movement on this soon.

As recommendations for the future are formulated, we hope the experience and views of everyone within the sector will be properly represented to ensure the change to come is positive for the decades ahead.

Paul Richardson is policy adviser for agriculture and climate change at Scottish Land and Estates