Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Christopher Nicholson: Farmers given more time to have say on new Land Reform Bill

The new Land Reform Bill will have a major impact on landowners with more than 3,000 hectares.
The new Land Reform Bill will have a major impact on landowners with more than 3,000 hectares.

The closing date for responses to the public consultation on Scottish Government proposals for the new Land Reform Bill has been extended by a month to October 30, so farmers who have been focused on harvest matters have a better opportunity to give their views.

While most of the expected tenancy reforms are contained in the separate Agriculture Bill consultation (the deadline is November 21), the reform bill contains significant measures that will affect tenant farming and tenants are urged to respond to both consultations.

The main thrust of the land reform measures appear aimed at “large-scale landholdings”.

Farm tenants on large estates, particularly those on the islands, will be well aware of potential negative impacts of concentrated ownership on their businesses and the wider local economy.

The proposals suggest a land holding will be large-scale if it is over 3,000ha; accounts for more than a fixed percentage of a local area; or is more than a minimum proportion of an inhabited island.

Proposals for Land Reform Bill

Such large-scale landholdings will be expected to comply with the Scottish Government’s Land Rights and Responsibilities Statement underpinned by statutory codes of practice and a complaints process for non-compliance. They will be expected to make public compulsory land management plans.

And they will be and subject to a public interest test applied should the landholding be transferred.

The proposals include a significant stick to be applied in the event of non-compliance by large-scale landholdings which is the withdrawal of public funding (eg agricultural, forestry and peatland grants). That will certainly focus landowners’ minds, especially if the stick also applied to breaches of the tenant farming codes of practice.

The establishment of the Scottish Land Commission and the Tenant Farming Commissioner in 2016 has improved relationships between landlords and tenants on many large estates. However, there are still some estates where management practices have failed to change through the voluntary approach.

New statutory proposals for large-scale holdings

These new statutory proposals for large-scale holdings will introduce a legal duty to comply with the Land Rights and Responsibilities Statement and associated codes of practice. There is some concern among tenants on lowland estates that the 3,000ha threshold is too high. With lowland tenanted holdings commonly being around 120ha in size, an estate with 20 or more farm tenants might not be classed as large-scale despite being a powerful local land monopoly.

The consultation will also interest tenant farmers who pay their rent to corporate bodies registered in offshore tax havens. Views are sought on whether all those acquiring land in Scotland and all recipients of land-based subsidies should be registered and liable to pay tax in the UK or EU.

An unexpected measure in the consultation paper is the proposal for a new type of tenancy called a Land Use Tenancy aimed at tenants wishing to undertake a combination of agricultural and non-agricultural activities.

There is little detail to comment on and this proposal has not come from any of the usual stakeholder bodies. The emerging view is the introduction of a new-style tenancy will require significant government resources to finalise and that time and effort would be better spent to ensure our existing tenancies, both secure and fixed-term, remain fit for purpose under future agricultural policy. Now harvest is over, tenant farmers should find time to respond to the Land Reform Bill consultation, either as individuals or though organisations such as STFA.


Christopher Nicholson is chair of the Scottish Tenant Farmers’ Association

Conversation