Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Assessor: I’m not expecting a rush of appeals against business rates

Post Thumbnail

The official in charge of north-east business rates believes there will be no avalanche of appeals in the weeks ahead, despite the bitter row over steep rises.

Crippling increases across the region, just as it strives to rebound from the oil and gas slump, have sparked calls for mass appeals and a boycott.

And Grampian Assessor, Ian Milton, said he could appreciate why so many companies were upset about the “sudden shock” of inflated bills.

However, he placed the blame on a government-imposed delay and argued there was a “strong argument” for more frequent revaluations.

Yet, despite being braced for a spike in complaints when bills hit doormats across the region, he does not expect any more people than usual to put up a fight.

In 2010, there were appeals on around 7,000 of the 25,000 properties.

Mr Milton said: “When people understand what their value represents, I don’t think we will really get substantially above that [figure].

“There is no cost to appeal it [the bill], so I am anticipating an increase, but I don’t think we are going to see 25,000 properties going to appeal.”

Mr Milton, vice-president of the Scottish Assessors Association, added that he could “understand why there is significant concern”.

Valuations in the north-east have gone up a fifth on average, while in Scotland as a whole, they are either the same or slightly down.

He said: “Budgets do not take kindly to sudden shocks. You have to find a way to smooth the peaks and troughs.”

The Scottish government initially refused to offer any relief, but were eventually forced into providing emergency help for some sectors.

Mr Milton said Holyrood officials had been supplied the figures last year and it had been “quite easy to see the direction of travel”.

So he suggested that more frequent revaluations than the present five-year cycle might help prevent a repeat of the present anger.

As he stated: “People would be more able to relate their assessment to their experience of the property market.

“As soon as you have an assessment that is historic, it loses its relevance in a way.”

He is confident the frequency could be increased without extra funding – especially if the volume of appeals dropped as a result.

Mr Milton said he “can’t apologise for the system” as he assured businesses his staff were “happy and ready to engage” with their rates concerns.

The “number one misconception” was owners who wrongly thought their rateable value was the amount they had to pay, he revealed.

But many others simply failed to grasp the full implications of a property-based tax system, he suggested.

“Everyone is working to a very tight bottom line so if people have concerns about their assessment, I am very keen that they speak to us direct and we give them the facts – what we are doing and why we are doing it,” he said.

“I can’t apologise for the system that I am part of. It is government policy that an element of public money is raised through local taxation based on the value of properties.”

He said it was important to explain that “if you take on risk, take on debt, take on a challenge and improve your business premises, then your ‘reward’ is that your rateable value will increase.

“It’s a difficult concept but this is a property tax.”

While his Woodhill House-based staff had to carry out valuations within a very strict legal framework, they were fully aware of the tough times businesses faced and were on hand to provide whatever advice they could, he added.

“You can’t do some kind of HMRC contact centre approach where only 60% of calls are answered when you have people on the phone who are really concerned.”