Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Michael Reid: The ins and outs of EBTs

Michael Reid at Meston Reid.
Michael Reid at Meston Reid. Image: Jim Irvine/DC Thomson

My article a few months ago resulted in a request for more information about the HMRC approach when tax is due by a company in liquidation, particularly if an Employee Benefit Trust “EBT” is involved.

Liquidators have the ability to agree a company’s tax liability with HMRC: sometimes achieved by discussion and provision of the limited information available; sometimes by the preparation of accounts and detailed computations.

If the liquidator advises HMRC there is nothing with which to pay a claim arising from a director’s involvement in an EBT, there’s an opportunity to pursue the director who received the cash under the principle of unjust enrichment and seek restitution to the company.

HMRC have been successful in most court cases that have challenged the validity of the myriad of EBT schemes.

In conjunction with the liquidator, an income tax and national insurance calculation can be prepared by HMRC which paves the way to lift the protection of limited liability and pursue a director personally for such deductions. It is often argued an EBT must have seemed too good to be true when a director elected to participate in terms of the ability to live and work normally in the UK without paying tax on substantial income earned from UK employment, meaning they have only themselves to blame.

The counter view is that all those who became involved in an EBT did so on the advice of professionals and so had every right to believe it was valid.

An increasing number of directors are seeking advice regarding their personal financial affairs because, when the money was received through an EBT it was spent rather than invested – that is, there is nothing left to settle any amount that may be due to HMRC.

Worrying times, but HMRC seem to have a conciliatory approach over repayment terms as they understand EBT participators were not trying to evade tax but merely avoid it with a scheme now shown to be inappropriate.

The views in this article are those of Michael J M Reid, licensed insolvency practitioner and partner of Meston Reid & Co, chartered accountants, Aberdeen. They do not purport to represent those of the firm in general.