Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Lawyer says firms may have to help workers lose weight

Sean Saluja
Sean Saluja

The question for the court was whether obesity was covered by disability discrimination under EU law.

The court ruled that obesity does not qualify automatically as a disability but equally is not excluded.

Obesity is a form of physical impairment, which may, depending upon its effects, amount to a disability.

It is for national courts to decide on a case-by-case basis whether the obesity amounts to a disability.

In the UK, in terms of the Equality Act 2010, that would require demonstrating a substantial and long-term adverse effect upon the ability to carry out normal day to day activities.

As with any other condition, severe obesity resulting in disability will give rise to various legal obligations – in particular the requirement to make reasonable adjustments to working practices and-or premises.

In the oil and gas sector this area has generated publicity alongside the Civil Aviation Authority review and recommendations resulting in regulations which will from April 2015 prohibit helicopter operators from carrying passengers whose body size, including safety and survival equipment, is incompatible with push-out window emergency exits.

It is important to note that this new regulation is not about obesity as such but rather physical dimensions.

Guidance references passengers who are defined as “extra broad”, meaning those exceeding 14-inch chest depth or 22-inch shoulder width.

For such individuals, the guidance is to allocate them to seats with a different type of access, which is larger.

If an employee in such circumstances were to be classified as being disabled, it is highly unlikely that a tribunal or court would require an employer as part of reasonable adjustments to provide alternative transportation methods.

Rather, it is more likely that an employer in such circumstances would require to consider how it may assist the employee to reduce physical size, consider different seating allocation to a larger exit – or ultimately alternative onshore employment.

Sean Saluja is the Aberdeen-based head of employment at law firm Burness Paull.