Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Inverness councillors debate findings of internal audit into arts project

Post Thumbnail

Inverness councillors admitted collective failings yesterday, following the controversial findings of an internal audit on how public art schemes in the city were governed and financed.

The inquiry centred on the funding arrangements for the Inverness Old Town Arts scheme between 2006 and 2010, which oversaw the installation of various Streetscape exhibits around the city.

Members of the City of Inverness Area Committee demanded that details from the audit, which were contained in confidential background documents and circulated to members, should be debated in public.

The Press and Journal has learned that the 36-page pink-paper document issued to members contained information to the effect that the council may have been “overbilled” by £4,500.

Sub-contractors also wrongly continued to use the Iota brand after the event, according to the internal council audit.

The report, which was handed to city councillors, confirmed publicly, for the first time, that the council’s arrangements for issuing contracts were not fully complied with or enforced.

It concluded that contracts worth almost £64,000 should have been put out to tender and issued by the local authority itself rather than a private arts organisation it had hired.

The council audit found there was “a lack of clarity on the contract arrangements” and invoices were not submitted within agreed timescales.

Yesterday, committee member, Jim Crawford, described the revelations as “outrageous.”

He added: “I hope we never see this in Highland Council again. It’s quite disgraceful.”

Fellow committee member, Thomas Prag, who was previously on an Iota advisory group, said: “There is no doubt that, if we had our time again, we would do it differently. Iota kept morphing from one thing to something else.”

Councillor Alasdair Christie agreed there was an element of collective blame among members.

He said: “People are willing to point fingers and have a witch hunt. But we all have to accept the findings of the audit. We are all responsible.

“We have got to put up our hands and say that we got it wrong.”

Councillor Donnie Kerr echoed the collective responsibility, adding: “I am aware there is an addendum, but I think it’s unfair to curtail any form of discussion here.”

Following the discussion, all members except Mr Kerr agreed to note the audit findings.

They also agreed to consider progress on an action plan.