Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scotland’s cultural life is much too important to be left to politicians of any party

Serious cuts to Creative Scotland's funding budget have enraged even people who normally support the Scottish Government.
Neil Drysdale
Holyrood protest
More than 100 people turned out to protest at Holyrood over culture funding cuts. Supplied by Craig Maclean/Equity

Scotland’s Makar isn’t a job for dissidents and agitators. It’s rather like the Poet Laureate: a role designed to celebrate and commemorate, not excoriate.

Yet, when Kathleen Jamie went on social media last week and read out her poem in response to the news of a £6.6m cut being reimposed in Creative Scotland’s funding, she offered a reminder that culture doesn’t exist in a vacuum.

Instead, her words painted a compelling picture of what art means for thousands of people in her homeland. “It’s a folk band crammed in the back of a van/On the low road to Mallaig/It’s Medea in the village hall/Black Watch in Cambuslang.

“We don’t sing from a balance sheet/We’re here for that sob in the pibroch that wad gar a grown man greet/For art’s the breath of human life/We are therefore we create/Though we manage it all on a shoestring or a wee totty share of the gate.”

Angus Robertson has faced criticism from many people for implementing cuts to Creative Scotland’s budget.

Protest over funding

Ms Jamie was one of many people to express anger and frustration at the decision announced by culture secretary, Angus Robertson, who has blamed “changing financial circumstances” and “persistently high inflation” for reducing the cash available to him.

And although Mr Robertson argued that Creative Scotland had “built up substantial funding reserves since 2018, when the Scottish Government began covering the shortfall in its National Lottery funding,” the blowback has been furious, even from those who have backed – and continue to back – the Scottish Government.

Although Mr Robertson argued that Creative Scotland had “built up substantial funding reserves since 2018, when the Scottish Government began covering the shortfall in its National Lottery funding,” the blowback has been furious.

The funding reserves  mean the groups Creative Scotland provides regular funding to will not lose out.  This week Mr Robertson pledged in parliament that the funding would be restored next year. When pressed by Labour’s Neil Bibby if the pledge on future funding was “gold plated” Mr Robertson said: “it is”.

Earlier this week more than 100 people, including members of performing arts and entertainment union Equity, gathered at Holyrood to protest the funding cut.

We all benefit from the arts

Meanwhile, Huntly singer, Iona Fyfe, is among those who have spoken out about the issue. She said: “Culture spending is not something to flip-flop over. It feeds into workers and consumers livelihoods’, their mental health, their community. We are all richer for engaging in the arts and we must stand up against cuts at all costs.

“The Campaign for the Arts has yet again resorted to a petition calling on the Scottish Government to honour its commitment to provide ‘an uplift of £6.6m for Creative Scotland for 2023-24’, scrap any proposal to cut funding from the 2023-24 autumn budget revision, and commit to maintaining and increasing investment from 2024-25.

“I believe that fulfilment of all three objectives is the only way to regain the trust of vital art sector workers and organisations.”

Iona Fyfe has been a longtime campaigner for fair pay for musicians. Image: Iona Fyfe.

Award-winning crime novelist, Chris Brookmyre, summed up the mood when he tweeted: “[I] keep seeing people talking about ‘robbing Peter to pay Paul’ and ‘making tough choices’ re arts spending.

“All this does is underline how the arts are seen as a luxury, which is the essence of the problem. If a culture doesn’t value its arts, it won’t just be the arts that atrophy.”

Culture should matter to all of us

His compatriot, Peter May, the best-selling author of the Lewis trilogy and creator of the Gaelic soap opera Machair, told me: “I am 100% in agreement with Chris.  I’ve spoken out often about library closures, and really this is just an extension of that.

“The arts comprise one of the essential pillars that prop up any society, along with education, health, and a fair and balanced legal system. To neglect any one of these is to undermine the very foundations of that society.

“We have to make balanced choices about what’s important to our culture, and to ca’ the feet from under our Scottish arts will only create a dangerous imbalance.”

Culture’s role in national identity

Some people might retort that if arts companies can’t survive without subsidies, why should the taxpayer continue to fling money in their direction? Yet, others point out that there wouldn’t be the breadth of talent in film, theatre, music of all varieties, art, dance and other forms of culture without a proper appreciation of a country’s heritage.

After all, it’s not as if Scotland has been splashing out on artistic endeavours. On the contrary, David Watt, chief executive of Culture & Business Scotland, told the Press & Journal that many organisations are forced to work hard just to balance their books.

He said: “Scotland’s spend on culture as a proportion of GDP is amongst Europe’s lowest, and the resources being allocated to our culture sector do not match the impact of its output. We know that the benefits of culture reverberate across multiple industries and the public sector in helping to address societal issues as well as playing an indispensable role in our national identity.”

David Watt, the chief executive of Culture & Business Scotland.

Fresh approach to investment

He added: “The Scottish government have consistently emphasised the importance of culture to our economic and civic wellbeing, yet recent funding decisions have been at odds with this narrative.

“Every year we see the huge contribution that Scotland’s cultural offering generates economically– with the Edinburgh Fringe Festival, for example, being worth about £1bn annually to our economy as this unique cultural tourism asset draws in thousands of visitors from across the globe

“If the government values Scotland’s culture as much as they say, they must prioritise the funding required to sustain and nurture it, so it can continue to deliver ambitious cultural experiences that make Scotland an attractive place in which to live, work and do business. Ultimately, this requires a fresh approach to investment in culture, so the sector receives support proportionate to the far-reaching benefits that it provides”

Kathleen Jamie has cut to the heart of culture funding cuts in a new poem. Pic: Scottish Poetry Library

‘The risks are increasing’

Creative Scotland has stated that it will be able to use National Lottery reserves to make up the shortfall, but warned that if the drop in budget was sustained, they would be forced to “pass it on to the sector”, comprising nearly 120 regularly funded bodies.

Its chief executive, Iain Munro, told MSPs last month: “I think there is despair, there is despondency, there is disillusionment. There is a fear and people are exhausted in trying to keep the show on the road, literally, and that is vital for planning confidence.

“I think in these situations, as the perfect storm continues, and I have got to say it’s growing stronger, the risks are increasing all of the time in relation to the potential for parts of the sector to be unsustainable.”

There has been anger over the decision to reinstate a £6.6m cut to Creative Scotland’s funding. Supplied by Craig Maclean/Equity.

Mr Robertson has striven to portray the situation as one where wage increases for workers in other sectors, such as nursing and teaching, have meant there is nothing left in the kitty for arts groups. However, not everybody, even in his own party, is convinced this addresses the problem adequately.

A Scottish Government spokesman said: “Officials statistics from the UK Government show that comparable cultural investment in Scotland is significantly higher than in England. Within the devolution settlement, Scotland has a largely fixed budget that is mainly derived from spending decisions of the UK Government.

The cupboard’s bare for culture

“This is in contrast to other independent nations within Europe who have control of all fiscal levers and whose available budget is not dictated by spending in another nation.”

Mr Robertson hopes to be able to help the beleaguered arts sector next year. But hope doesn’t pay the bills for those who find themselves in the cultural slow lane.