Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Builders win battle for Culloden Moor

Builders win battle  for Culloden Moor

CAMPAIGNERS have called for the Highlands’ most famous battlefield to be given special protection after the Scottish Government backed plans to build houses beside it.

There are fears that Culloden Moor will be swamped by urban sprawl after a development company won its fight to put homes next to one of the most iconic pieces of land in the country.

The local authority rejected an application from Inverness Estates for 16 residential plots just half a mile from the scene of the last pitched battle fought on British soil.

But the company appealed, and yesterday Scottish Government planning reporter Richard Hickman reversed Highland Council’s decision.

Up to 2,000 soldiers, mostly Highlanders, died during the hour-long Battle of Culloden on April 16, 1746, when Bonnie Prince Charlie and his Jacobite army were routed by government forces.

The moor is a special place for many Scots, and a visitor centre at the site now attracts thousands of people from all over the world every year.

The National Trust for Scotland (NTS), which manages the battlefield and centre, objected to the plans for houses at Viewhill, Balloch, claiming they could affect the special character of the area.

There was also opposition from residents at Viewhill, and Balloch Community Council.

Councillor Jim Crawford, an Independent, yesterday called for government ministers to step in, overrule their planning officials and protect the battlefield.

He said decisions on development around the site should not be taken at council level, and added: “This is the most important landscape left in Scotland.

“We will end up with a situation where you could be on the battlefield and you will see a modern housing development on the edge of it.

“It is not appropriate and I am very disappointed with the reporter.”

And Ian Williams, chairman of Balloch Community Council, said building houses near the battlefield raised concerns that it would “become part of the urban sprawl”.

He added: “You only have to look at the Bannockburn site to see the encroachment of houses there.”

An NTS spokeswoman said: “We are disappointed at this decision.

“We are concerned that encroaching development on Culloden Battlefield – a site of outstanding heritage significance – could further erode its unique sense of place.”

Inverness Estates, which is a joint venture between Tulloch Homes Group and Upland Developments, will demolish a number of disused farm buildings to make way for the housing plots. The company’s agent, Gary Johnston, of GH Johnston Building Consultants Ltd, said that the firm was delighted with the decision to uphold the appeal, and was starting work on detailed designs.

He added: “We discussed the proposals with the National Trust for Scotland during the application and we feel that their comments and observations can be taken on board to provide a quality of design in keeping with this landscape setting.”

A Scottish Government spokeswoman did not comment on Mr Crawford’s calls for ministers to examine the application.

She said: “The reporter has issued an intentions notice which means planning permission will be granted subject to an agreement being reached between the council and the appellant to secure contributions to affordable housing and improvements to cycling and footpaths.”

There are 11 existing houses on the unclassified track off Culloden Road.

Residents claimed that there would be road safety issues, increased potential for flooding and a loss of privacy and amenity because of the new development.

Comment, Page 28