Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Al Fayed’s warning on crossing closure

Al Fayed’s warning on crossing closure

TYCOON Mohamed Al Fayed has threatened to pull the plug on plans for scores of new houses if Network Rail chiefs close a level crossing where two teenagers were killed.

Locals also fear the proposed move could add 10-15 minutes to journey times and want the junction retained and new safety measures introduced.

The crossing at Delny was the scene of a crash in 2007 that left two teenagers dead.

They were passengers in a car that was hit by a train. The car driver was later given a five-year custodial sentence.

Network Rail has asked Highland Council to allow it to close the Easter Ross crossing, claiming it is unsafe – but this would shut a direct route to and from the A9 Inverness-Thurso road.

Mr Al Fayed said the move would force him to rethink a proposed 90-acre development at Barbaraville, near Kildary, on Balnagown Estates, which would include affordable and executive homes.

Jonathan Henson, of Balnagown Estates, said yesterday: “Balnagown Estates is working on a solution which would enable some form of crossing at Delny to be maintained.

“We met Network Rail representatives to discuss the possibility of installing some form of barrier crossing, but Network Rail indicated that, regardless of any development proposal, the existing crossing at Delny would have to be closed on safety grounds and replaced with a pedestrian crossing.”

He added that Network Rail indicated the only solution would be a bridge.

Mr Henson said: “In the event that a solution cannot be found, Balnagown will not be proceeding with the development as presently proposed.

“Network Rail has indicated that they are still planning to close the crossing and Balnagown Estates would fight the closure of the crossing given its impact on the local community and its own land.”

Kilmuir and Logie Easter Community Council chairman John Boocock said yesterday that local people wanted the crossing retained with improved safety measures, including barriers and signs.

He said: “I have no evidence that Balnagown Estates has any interest in the wishes of the local community – only in their planning application.

“They created this situation. When they submitted their planning application to Highland Council, there were no plans to close the crossing.”

Mr Boocock said that when the application for the 100 homes was lodged in 2008, Network Rail objected, and the following year the crossing closure was mooted.

He added that the community council had obtained correspondence from Highland Council under freedom of information legislation that showed the main reason for closing the Delny crossing had nothing to do with safety.

He said: “The two issues – crossing closure and the planning application – should now be dealt with completely separately, especially as the housing development looks to be purely speculative.”

The community council has asked for a meeting with the council’s chief executive to discuss the issues.

A Network Rail spokesman said: “The safety of both motorists and rail users is our priority when reviewing level crossings.

“We have no plans to introduce the new barrier system at this location as we do not believe it to be a suitable solution to future levels of usage on the road.

“Future housing growth is one of the reasons why we wish to remove vehicles from the Delny crossing and we previously objected to the development in question.”