Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Technical records for week leading up to copter crash highlight ‘number of discrepancies’

Technical records for week leading up to copter crash highlight ‘number  of discrepancies’

A senior air accident investigator has told an inquiry that Bond Offshore Helicopters did not keep maintenance records “by the book” in the week leading up to a fatal crash involving one of its aircraft.

Mark Jarvis, senior engineering inspector for the Air Accidents Investigations Branch (AAIB), said there were a “number of potential issues” with the operator’s records relating to extra checks due to have been completed on the doomed Super Puma AS332 L2.

The inquiry heard previously that additional inspections were ordered after a particle of metal was found in the helicopter’s magnetic chip detector in the epicyclic gearbox module on March 25, 2009 – a week before the aircraft plunged into the North Sea, killing all 16 people on board.

But yesterday, Mr Jarvis told solicitor advocate Tom Marshall, who represents 13 of the victims’ families, that although engineers logged the extra inspections, they did not refer to the official maintenance manual, which would have also required them to carry out a “heavy-hover” check.

Mr Marshall took the 50-year-old through Bond’s technical logs for the week leading up to the crash on April 1, 2009, and suggested there were a number of discrepancies about whether the inspections had been carried out.

He pointed out that six of the 12 inspections that should have been done had either been carried out incorrectly or improperly logged.

Mr Marshall also noted from the records that one of the inspections did not appear to have been carried out when it should have been on March 26.

He said: “We’ve gone through one week and there are a number of discrepancies in the maintenance records – fair comment?”

Mr Jarvis replied: “There are a number of potential issues with the record-keeping, yes.”

However, he told the hearing that his co-worker, Christopher Scott, would be able to verify whether all the checks had been properly carried out when he gave evidence.

Sheriff Derek Pyle suggested the key point was that engineers had failed to take the necessary steps after discovering the particle.

He said: “Would you agree that the important thing here is that Bond didn’t do it by the book?

“The fact is Bond failed to do something it ought to have done right at the start?”

Mr Jarvis agreed. The inquiry, at Aberdeen Town House, continues.