Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Sheriff rules out reports on helicopter’s air-worthiness

Sheriff rules out reports on helicopter’s air-worthiness

Air-worthiness reports for the helicopter involved in the 2009 North Sea Super Puma disaster do not have to be disclosed, the sheriff overseeing the fatal accident inquiry has ruled.

Tom Marshall, lawyer for 13 of the 16 bereaved families, requested the information as Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) bosses gave evidence in Aberdeen yesterday.

But Sheriff Principal Derek Pyle turned him down, saying the CAA was sufficiently satisfied with the operational performance of helicopter firm Bond before and after the catastrophe to allow it to keep flying aircraft.

On hearing Mr Marshall claim he was having to question the CAA witnesses “blind” without key information about Bond, Sheriff Pyle said it should be enough to ask the aviation regulator’s representatives if they had any concerns.

“Presumably, Bond have nothing to hide,” he added.

CAA flight operations chief Bob Jones and air-worthiness boss John McColl both confirmed there was never any reason to suspend Bond’s operating licence.

But a CAA inspection report about a year before the accident revealed weaknesses in Bond’s operations.

A pilot was suspended because his flying licence was not signed in the right place and immersion suits were not serviced according to schedule.

There were also documentation and training issues, but none of these deficiencies was deemed important enough to endanger Bond’s all-important air operator certificate.

Mr Marshall said further details of these “findings” and any others registered by CAA inspectors could shed light on Bond’s maintenance performance.

Counsel representing Bond during the inquiry, Jack Davidson QC, said he had extended a “commendable degree of tolerance” to Mr Marshall over the past few weeks, but the request for itemised records from the CAA was “beyond the pale”.

Mr Davidson said: “In the course of this inquiry I have made several objections as to the scope of Mr Marshall’s questions. “There are several crucial issues that require to be resolved.

“While there may be criticism of certain aspects of the maintenance work carried out by Bond, it would be surprising if any organisation as large was subjected to a fine-tooth comb without it giving rise to some findings.”

The inquiry is investigating the circumstances surrounding Bond Flight 85N on April 1, 2009, when the Super Puma AS332 L2 plunged into the sea on its way back to Aberdeen from BP’s Miller platform.

All 16 people on board were killed in the tragedy.