Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fears for future of hill farms

Fears for future of hill farms

A group representing Highland and island councils yesterday warned the Scottish Government Cap reform proposals could have a devastating impact on active hill farmers and lead to a further exodus from livestock production.

The Highlands and Islands Agricultural Support Group wants an increase in the touted area payment rates for the new rough grazing region, rather than it being divided up further as some have suggested.

The group, which speaks for councils in Shetland, Orkney, the Western Isles and Argyll and Bute, has followed the Scottish Crofting Federation in expressing alarm at the suggested 20-25 euro (£16.50-£20.75) a hectare payment.

Councillor Drew Ratter, of Shetland Islands Council, said: “The proposed rough grazing rate will be devastating for active hill farmers in the Highlands and islands and I’m sure for other hill areas in Scotland. To have published a rate so low with no explanation as to why the earlier exhaustive modelling has been dismissed is simply devastating.”

Mr Ratter said that work, first discussed at a conference organised by the government last spring, had indicated a potential payment range of between 27-68 euros (£22.40-£56.44) a hectare. Many had expected and believed the rates would be within that range in the consultation that was launched in December and on which industry is being asked to comment.

Mr Ratter said the minimum rate needed to support hill farming was about 35 euros (£29) a hectare, which was at the bottom end of the various payment models produced previously by the government.

“The founding principle of this round of Cap reform was to move away from historic production-based subsidy to a flatter area rate and move towards convergence of payments within member states. A very low basic payment for the rough grazing region could lead to a significant number of the surviving genuinely active producers in the fragile areas to de-stock and another round of land abandonment which is surely in no one’s interest.

“We propose the 35 euro rate on the clear understanding that this payment will only be available to active producers and that the Scottish Government will deliver on its undertaking to exclude naked acres and inactive producers (slipper farmers) from the new payment scheme.

“We believe that anything less would be a betrayal of Cabinet Secretary Richard Lochhead’s clearly stated intention to support our region on this, and would intentionally withdraw much-needed money from threatened agricultural systems in the Highlands and islands.”

Mr Ratter said the group had with the advice of others worked tirelessly to help government in its quest to design the new Cap support programme. But he added: “All that work seems to have gone by the wayside, with two years of work forgotten.”

But the government said its proposals as they stood would overall deliver an extra £3.99million in the Western Isles, £5.07million across the Highlands and £2.24million to Shetland, assuming the claimed land area remains the same.

A spokeswoman said: “We are taking industry concerns very seriously, and are open to suggestions for workable solutions. However, in the face of budget cuts imposed by Westminster we need to consider the needs of Scottish agriculture as a whole.”