Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Carbon capture ‘poses huge gas leak risk’

Carbon capture ‘poses huge gas  leak risk’

A new report has warned that millions of tonnes of dangerous gas could spew from the North Sea if carbon capture technology goes wrong.

A UK Government study seen by the Press and Journal says pioneering plans to inject COemissions into spent oil and gas wells could lead to cracks opening up in the seabed.

It concludes that in a worst-case scenario, carbon dioxide could leak for “up to five years”.

Conditions off the north-east coast of Scotland are believed to be perfect for carbon capture and storage (CCS), which could create thousands of jobs in Peterhead.

But the report reveals that a crack – known as a fault line – stretching up from a disused well to the seabed could potentially release up to 2.7million tonnes of carbon dioxide.

That would be equivalent to the annual exhaust fumes of 1.1million cars.

An environmental group said the papers revealed “some potentially major problems” but it was “reassured” that all but the worst-case scenarios could be dealt with.

A CCS project at Peterhead aims to capture carbon dioxide at the town’s power station then pump it into a depleted gas field.

But, last year, academics at Bristol University said using offshore oil and gas reservoirs “could have the potential to trigger earthquakes” and “reactivate faults and fractures”.

Their fears appear to be backed up by the government report, which investigated the risks and “financial consequences” of the technology failing.

It examined the impact of leaks from operating and abandoned wells, how they would be controlled and how much COcould escape, and it says there can be “no absolute guarantee” that the COwill remain in the wells into which it is injected.

It says the main source of problems could be abandoned wells, which could leak when the area is filled with carbon.

The report estimates that 1,000 tonnes a day could escape before a relief well – which would cost upwards of £25million – could be drilled.

While concluding that the chances of carbon injection fracturing the seabed are extremely low, it acknowledges that “there are few proven technical options for remediating leakage from a fault”.

Friends of the Earth Scotland director Richard Dixon said the report highlighted some worrying cases, but he was reassured by the fact there were solutions for most problems.

He said: “There are some potentially major problems, but it is quite reassuring that there is a solution for all but the worst-case scenario.”

Shell is driving forward a plan to develop CCS at Peterhead’s gas-fired power station. The firm declined to comment, but a source said the need for reservoir pressure management was “well understood both by regulators and the industry”.

A spokeswoman for the UK Government’s Department of Energy and Climate Change said the report showed all but the most extreme leaks could be dealt with quickly and economically.

“This technical report shows that a leak of carbon dioxide from a licensed storage site is very unlikely,” she said. “The overwhelming body of evidence gives us confidence that a storage site licensed in accordance with European law will not leak.