Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Council visit to site of turbines proposal

Council visit to  site of turbines proposal

Highland councillors yesterday visited the proposed site of a controversial Sutherland windfarm which has received more than 30 objections.

The application is due to be decided in Inverness today at a meeting of the north planning applications committee.

Edinburgh-based renewable energy developer, Wind Prospect Developments Ltd, wants to erect 13 turbines to the west of Craggiemore on Tressady Estate north-west of Rogart, on behalf of French energy giant EDF.

Councillors on the planning committee went to various viewpoints to see for themselves the area targeted by the developers. They also noted the existing windfarm next door to the site at Kilbraur.

The proposed devices, which will be 377ft high with a 295ft rotary span, would have an overall energy capacity of 32.5MW, enough to power up to 17% of homes in the Highlands.

Among those criticising the proposal are local residents’ action group No More Windfarms, which convened in the summer of 2013 in response to growing concerns about the proliferation of turbines in the Strath Brora area.

A letter of objection to the Tressady plans was submitted on behalf of the action group on December 31, 2013, which stated: “The overall conclusion is that the proposal is not in accordance with the development plans (Highland-wide policy) and that, therefore, the presumption, in law, is for the refusal of planning permission.”

In total, Highland Council have received 31 letters of objection to the plans relating to concerns over the spread of windfarms in the region, their visual impact, noise pollution, and negative effects on tourism and wildlife.

There were four letters of support for the application.

A local resident, who wished not to be named, and who rents land on part of the estate on which the proposed turbines would stand, said: “The windfarm would bring in money at a time when agricultural incomes are particularly reduced and help sustain the local crofting way of life.

“Some of the people who have objected to the plans are not even living in the area and they might just be against windfarms in general.”

Rogart Community Council did not object but raised concerns about the disproportionate share of windfarms in the area, and the suitability of the site because of the peat resource which will release carbon dioxide if disturbed.