Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Couple’s plan to build two houses sparks huge protest

Couple’s plan to build two houses sparks huge protest

Plans to build two homes in a secluded Nairnshire glen have sparked a flood of objections from local residents.

Mr and Mrs Graham Sinclair, of Nairn, have applied for planning permission to build two one-and-a-half storey homes in a field at Drummournie, near Cawdor.

But residents are up in arms and 17 people have written to Highland Council to call for the plans to be thrown out.

One local woman said she feared the homes would affect her water supply as she said there was a limited supply available and her home regularly suffered from lack of water pressure.

Others claimed the proposal was against council planning policy for building in hinterland countryside and said the private track running to the homes would not support the additional traffic.

Bryan Mitchell, who has lived in the area for 16 years, is one of those objecting to the plans.

He said: “The locals here are 100% against it. There are about 10 of us and none are in support. There are other people from the wider area and who come here on holiday who are also objecting.

“Drummournie is a unique valley. There are private tracks in and out and we don’t want a precedent set here for development. It is against council planning policies. We are in the hinterland and the presumption is against building here.”

He added: “The idea is to turn a small field into something that is full of money.”

Fellow objector Michael Stubbs also wrote to the council to object.

He said: “This application if approved would set a precedent making present and future planning policy laughable and uncontrollable. To spend public money on consultation papers, publish and ratify planning policy and then not adhere to that policy is inexcusable and an abuse of public trust.”

There are no objections from statutory consultees such as Scottish Water and Highland Council’s transport, environmental and community services department.

Mr Sinclair yesterday declined to comment on the objections.

The application is expected to be considered by Highland councillors next month.