Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Councillors admit higher care costs for vulnerable people was poorly handled

Aberdeenshire Council was branded the "landlord from hell"
Aberdeenshire Council was branded the "landlord from hell"

Aberdeenshire councillors have admitted their introduction of higher care costs for vulnerable people was poorly handled.

And the controversy took a new twist yesterday when the local authority revealed the policy could be scaled back in the years ahead.

In April, the 35% cap on how much people who use non-residential care in Aberdeenshire are charged was scrapped, forcing dozens of people to pay thousands of pounds in additional fees.

The move sparked widespread anger across the region and councillors conceded the £16,000 threshold at which service users pay for their care in full was set too low.

The threshold has now been increased to £26,250, backdated to April. Any overpayments will be reimbursed.

Members of the social work and housing committee backed the U-turn, but the row over the implementation of the costs will rumble on.

Opposition councillors have now formally called for the new fees to be phased in over a five-year period rather than implemented immediately.

Turriff councillor Anne Robertson, social work spokeswoman for the Alliance opposition group, said: “At the December meeting, when this was discussed, we agreed the principle and asked to look at the implementation in a particular way.

“I think we need to look closely at how it was implemented and what lessons can be learned. We have all had correspondence from people in our area.”

Mrs Robertson added that many care users had struggled with the scale of the new fees, saying: “We would like to propose that retrospective phasing is introduced due to the magnitude.”

The opposition have called for the fees to be phased in over at least a five-year period from April, retrospectively.

Although the committee unanimously backed the new fees when they convened last year, there is a consensus among councillors that the policy was poorly handled.

Independent councillor Dave Stewart said: “After I heard a few cases and saw the implications of what we were doing to vulnerable people, their carers and family, I felt sick to my stomach then and I do now.”

Adam Coldwells, the chief of the Aberdeenshire Health and Social Care Partnership, added: “We’ve done lots of rethinking on that – understandably, there are things we could do better in the future.”

However, Mr Coldwells argued the committee did not have the financial power to cut back the charges. The decision will now be referred to full council.