Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Glamping ground row over dangerous road

There are concerns the development could affect the River Deveron.
There are concerns the development could affect the River Deveron.

A north-east councillor revealed his lack of faith in the theory of evolution during a bizarre argument over a camp site.

Banff and Buchan area committee will visit a Forglen farm next month before they rule on whether or not its owner can instal seven yurts and three wigwams, despite protests from nearby neighbours.

Ten objectors have lodged concerns about the impact the development could have on the local roads and the River Deveron, but Aberdeenshire Council’s planning officers have backed the project at Silverstripe.

Councillors yesterday agreed to visit the proposed glamping ground before reaching a final decision. And, during a heated debate, local man Lex Allison – who has farmed nearby for 34 years – claimed service to the site would rely on a single-track road that was not fit for purpose.

He added: “It has no pavements for pedestrians and has no passing places.

“When vehicles meet, there is a need for someone to reverse. Sometimes, this can be a considerable distance and onto the main road.”

The camp site would provide parking for up to 26 visiting vehicles.

However, Fraserburgh councillor Michael Watt, dismissed concerns that locals would be inconvenienced by more cars on the road.

Instead, hailing the proposal as “fantastic”, he said the likelihood of two cars coming face-to-face on the route was as “probable as the theory of evolution”.

And then he added: “It’s highly improbable.

“I don’t think there will be 26 cars going up and down this road. I understand the concept ‘not in my backyard’, I really do, but you have got to look at the wider picture.”

Along with Brian Topping, he urged the committee to approve the scheme. But chairman John Cox used his casting vote to push through a site visit.

Fraserburgh councillor Ian Tait, who echoed concerns about the road, did not vote.