Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

No decision on cuts to OAP and disabled leisure access until February

Post Thumbnail

A decision on stripping some over-60s and disabled people of cut-price access to leisure facilities in the north-east has been deferred until next year.

Sporting chiefs have argued Aberdeen’s discount scheme is “unsustainable” in its current form at a time of badly-squeezed budgets.

But they have been warned by the city council the changes will be blocked unless they produce better evidence of the impact both on finances and users.

The proposals were originally knocked back until December by the local authority’s finance committee for consultation with its disability watchdog.

But now it has emerged they will not be discussed until at least February.

The delay was revealed by Sport Aberdeen’s business development director Jill Franks when she met the Disability Equity Partnership.

She explained the aim was to “target the scheme more closely to those who deserve it the most within constrained financial times.”

And she added: “Inevitably, there are going to be some winners and there are going to be some losers.”

The panel responsible for drawing up the proposals – which includes the council and other bodies – has conceded they are based on “limited research”.

DEP chair Dame Anne Begg said it was “very difficult to make judgments if you don’t have the statistics”.

She called for urgent talks over how many people would lose out and how much money would be saved by the scheme.

Partnership member Ron Holding said it appeared bosses were seeking to target “low hanging fruit” in the search for savings.

Ms Franks responded, despite the lack of available data about current uptake: “We are confident that the conclusions are actually fairly valid”.

She suggested that if everyone who was eligible for discounts paid full price, that could result in an additional £300,000 of income.

Finance committee convenor Willie Young said: “There’s no use cutting just for the sake of it. They need to justify what they are going to do.

“Unless I see a benefit, not just to us as an authority, but to the people that it is affecting, then we will be saying ‘thank you very much for the report, but we do not support it – you will have to go and think again.”