Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Bungled solar panel deal could cost taxpayer £500,000

Figures showed half a million solar panels were installed every day last year across the globe
Figures showed half a million solar panels were installed every day last year across the globe

A bungled Aberdeen City Council deal to fix solar panels to public buildings could end up costing taxpayers more than £500,000.

The local authority has already shelled out £275,000 after the energy systems had to be switched off due to fire fears – and then the company involved had to be paid for loss of earnings.

But it emerged yesterday that the bill could be far higher because 40% of the panels remain turned off.

A full investigation has now been ordered into the “completely unacceptable” debacle.

The council entered into an agreement with Mark Group Ltd and Our Generation Ltd for the supply and installation of photovoltaic (PV) panels to 72 local authority buildings.

Under the terms of the deal, signed in April 2012, the council had an obligation to pay loss of generation income to Our Generation Solar.

But the agreement meant the council had to compensate the firm when the systems had to be switched off due to health and safety fears.

Yesterday, the audit committee heard that around 40% are still switched off with “thermal events” reported including fires.

Members decided to order an investigation into how the deal had been entered ahead of a report being prepared for next week’s finance committee.

Legal officers will also scrutinise the details of the deal – with a council source hinting that legal action could possibly follow.

When approved in 2011 by the previous administration it was predicted that the authority’s fuel bills would be slashed by £100,000 a year.

Stephen Booth, senior service manager asset manager, told the committee the decision to enter the deal had been made by “senior officers”, with around 60% of the purchased panels currently operational.

The Mark Group has now gone into administration, resulting in the debate coming to the committee.

A report read: “As a result of the Mark Group entering administration there are legal and financial issues that require to be resolved which may result in a further claim for loss of generation which will require to be evaluated.

“It is therefore suggested that a future report is submitted to the (finance) committee with an action plan to mitigate any further contractual payments towards loss of income to Our Generation Solar.”

Labour finance convener Willie Young said: “Every minute of every day these panels are potentially costing the taxpayer money.

“There is a worry the costs could escalate up to half a million so we need clarity and transparency on what went wrong.”

SNP finance spokesman Graham Dickson said: “I think today raised more questions than answers and it’s essential we launch a deeper investigation.”

Liberal Democrat committee member Martin Greig said: “I would like to see an explanation that will clarify how this major decision was made without councillors made aware until a very late stage.”

Audit convener Stephen Flynn said: “The situation we find ourselves in is obviously completely unacceptable.”

Eben Wilson of the Taxpayer Scotland campaign group said: “The zeal to be seen to be green has clearly overturned common sense and due diligence.

“Taxpayers do not want to be parties to risks with their hard-earned money.

“Financial risks are for companies who fund losses from their own resources, not our public service providers.

“Many people in need will have lost out to a corporate energy supplier when funds are spent on dealing with this mess. This sort of ineptitude makes a farce of any claim that councils can promote fairness and equality. ”

Our Generation Solar, registered in Brighton, could not be reached for comment.