Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Kingsford Stadium objectors reject Dons’ olive branch

An artist's impression of Kingsford Stadium
An artist's impression of Kingsford Stadium

Objectors to Aberdeen’s £50 million new stadium plans have snubbed talks with the club.

The olive branch was put forward by club chairman Stewart Milne who wanted discussions with the No Kingsford Stadium (NKS) group over the stadium and training facilities plan.

But last night the group, which claims it has raised £64,000 towards a legal challenge of the development, said the meeting would be “inappropriate”.

A statement from the group read: “NKS received an invitation from AFC to discuss the stadium and facilities for which Aberdeen City Council have been given planning approval.

“Our group represents thousands of local residents who are opposed to the principle of the stadium development and the erosion of the greenbelt.

“It would be inappropriate to meet to discuss a development which we are fundamentally opposed to, and particularly as we intend to challenge this planning decision.”

The project was approved by Aberdeen City Council in January, despite neighbouring Aberdeenshire voting against it in an advisory capacity.

The group believes the city council has gone against its own policies of developing on green belt land – which will form a key plank of the judicial review.

But the club has argued the review will merely delay work and ultimately could simply be approved again by planners – and risk having to pay legal fees for the council if they lose.

Mr Milne described the plans for a legal review of the planning process for granting the stadium plan as a waste of money.

He said: “It’s patently clear that the objectors cannot stop our plans. They could potentially delay the project for a matter of months, but at significant cost and risk to them.

“Those donating or making pledges towards a potential judicial review are simply wasting their money on a futile exercise that will put a drain on council resources and could damage our reputation as a region in which to invest.”