Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Not enough justification to reopen Aberdeen junction, says report

Locator of the Bedford Avenue junction with St Machar Drive, Aberdeen.
Locator of the Bedford Avenue junction with St Machar Drive, Aberdeen.

Plans to reopen a busy Aberdeen junction have suffered a blow after council officers ruled there was “no justification” for the change.

Residents living in Powis estate have faced a longer route to get to their homes since a controversial bus gate was installed to stop motorists using Bedford Road.

It has been a source of frustration to motorists in the city since it was opened in July 2016 to prevent drivers using it as a through road to the new Diamond bridge.

In November councillors approved a plan to allow taxis through and investigate the feasibility of creating a left turn exit from Bedford Avenue onto St Machar Drive with access only allowed for cars registered at Powis Crescent, Powis Circle and Bedford Avenue.

The junction was closed off in the 1980s due to safety concerns for pupils crossing the road as they headed to school.

However, a new report, to be debated next week, states that there was not “sufficient justification” to reopen the Bedford Avenue junction as the area is already tarred over adding that the different technology available to help control vehicle access would be expensive.

The report to the operational delivery committee reads: “With 397 properties within the proposed area, lockable bollards would be unworkable; particularly managing copies of keys or replacing lost or damaged keys.

“Similarly, a fob or key card system would require considerable levels of management and there would be an ongoing cost to manage this. The provision of automatic rising bollards linked to an Automatic Number Plate Recognition ANPR camera would be the most straightforward system requiring a permit based “whitelist” to be reviewed annually.”

The cost of such a scheme could be between £30,000 and £50,000, the report warns.

Council transport spokesman Ross Grant, the councillor who put forward the motion to investigate, said: “The feasibility study shows conclusively that despite my well intended motives to open up this route the traffic surveys carried out shows there is no justification for implementing the measures proposed at this time.

“As the Berryden Corridor is developed I will ask officers to look again at these proposals to see if significant traffic management changes allow the council to open up this route as proposed.”

But SNP councillor Alex McLellan said: “The SNP position remains the same, in that the council should explore the possibility of allowing local residents through the bus gate. I am disappointed that we still don’t have officers opinions on our suggestion as councillor Grant refused to have it looked into.”