Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Controversial plans for new service station off A90 rejected – after objectors threaten it would ‘leave blood on the hands of the council’

Post Thumbnail

Controversial plans for a new service station in the north-east have been rejected by councillors over major road safety concerns.

The Aberdeenshire infrastructure services committee heard from objectors that if the Laurencekirk services proposal was approved, it would ‘leave blood on the hands of the council’.

Councillors voted yesterday and emphatically rejected the application by Luther Farm Services by 11 votes to two.

Much of the criticism of the scheme focused on the fact drivers would be forced to cross the A90 dual carriageway at a narrow junction to reach the facilities.

Councillor Paul Johnston lodged a motion to refuse the application because the roads were not wide enough and there was ‘sufficient evidence’ for refusal.

Meeting chair Peter Argyle agreed and said: “I’m aware of all the efforts we’ve had to try and help safety on the A90.

“I can’t support even a good project if it requires the crossing of the A90.”

The applicants explained the plans included a petrol station, hotel, restaurant and the opportunity for 100 jobs, but would not be accessible to HGVs.

Councillor Sandy Wallace, who supported the project at the Kincardine and Mearns area committee, was disappointed with the outcome.

He said: “It would be a small roadside services since HGV are not included and I think Transport Scotland did not express a [view on] refusal as there’s no real objection or material refusal.

“It would be wonderful if people would drive into the area in search of petrol, but unless they see it they won’t stop.

“We then have the opportunity to bring them in and divert them.”

One of the objectors, who recently got married, said his wife used the road every working day and ‘the last thing I want to see is her under a bus’.

He added that approving the plans would ‘leave blood on the hands of the council’.

The owner of Stracathro services, Pat Melville-Evans, also objected to the venture.

After the decision, she said: “I’m pleased it wasn’t passed from a safety point of view as I have known people who died on that road and, without a flyover as part of the plans, more people would have been killed.”