Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Trump Organisation warns it will walk away if north-east housing plans are rejected

The Trump organisation has threatened to walk away from further investment in the north-east if its £150 million housing plans are rejected by planners.

Legal representatives for the organisation warned councillors there is “no choice” if they do not grant permission in principle for the Menie Estate at a public hearing last night.

Aberdeenshire Council invited the developer and opponents to the meeting at Ellon Academy last night to allow councillors to hear both the arguments in favour and against the Trump Estate.

An application to build the scheme was first revealed in July. It includes proposals for 50 cottages and luxury housing close to the course, near Balmedie.

But campaigners argue that the developer is reneging on the original first phase of plans for the estate, which would have included a hotel and second golf course as well as holiday accommodation, and is now trying to push forward with a housing development which will have minimal economic benefit for the region.

The meeting followed a visit to the site by members of the Formartine area committee in the afternoon.

Anne Faulds, a planning lawyer for firm CMS, spoke on behalf of the developer and said that circumstances had changed since the development was first given tacit approval in 2008, due to the global banking crisis and the recent oil and gas downturn.

She issued an ultimatum to all gathered at the meeting and bemoaned the treatment the developer has faced.

“The changes in the economic climate have meant the phasing initially agreed is not economically viable,” she said.


>> Keep up to date with the latest news with The P&J newsletter


“There is not a choice between this proposal or the one agreed in 2008, it’s a choice between this or nothing.

“We are criticised for not developing soon enough and now we are criticised for trying to develop.”

The development would also include a gym, equestrian centre and space for shops and offices.

The organisation has previously predicted the scheme could create 2,000 construction jobs, almost 300 full-time posts and be worth £250 million to the region’s economy.

However, soon after the plans were made public they drew criticism, with more than 3,000 official letters of objection submitted to Aberdeenshire Council.

Five campaigners spoke at the meeting and claimed the revised plan was the latest in a series of “broken promises” since the golf course was approved.

Menie resident David Milne, who has battled with the Trump organisation for more than a decade, urged councillors to reject the plans.

He said the Trump brand had been badly damaged and would bring negative attention to the region.

And he also raised doubts over the developer’s claims about the economic benefits, branding them as “nothing more than a list of hopes and dreams without substance”.

Meanwhile, Rohan Beyts also made an impassioned plea to councillors to dismiss the application.

She said: “Whether you support this development or not, there’s no way that a housing scheme is of national importance.

“It will deliver a sixth of the jobs that were promised in the original plan.

“This is nothing more than an attempt to get the maximum benefit to the developer with minimum benefit for the local area.”

Bill Harrison, Robert Menlove and Valerie Banks also spoke, sharing many of the same concerns and also highlighting the impact the development would have on the surrounding roads and natural landscape.

A decision will be taken on the plans by full council in March.