Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Aberdeenshire’s councillors unite in calling for more cash-raising powers from Scottish Government

Post Thumbnail

Aberdeenshire’s finance chiefs have made repeated calls for more powers to be devolved to local government.

The authority has in the region of £20million of savings it has to make over the next year in order to balance the books.

Both the administration and opposition are yet to reveal their plans for closing the funding gap.

However, both sides of the chamber are in agreement that local authorities should have more control over their finances.

Council leader Jim Gifford said he was firmly behind the Greens’ push for more cash-raising powers for councils.

He said: “What we have been pushing for through the Cosla negotations is exactly that – more flexibility, more discretion over making more money.

“Exactly what that means in practice remains to be seen but that is what we have been asking for.

“We want a better pot of cash than we are getting currently because there’s just not enough money there.

“We want more flexibility to raise and keep taxes locally, we think things like business rates should be managed in this way.”

And he also said he shared Aberdeenshire West Tory Alexander Burnett’s concerns about income tax rises hitting the region hardest.

“There is only one pot of money and if you are extracting more from it nationally it’s hard to get more locally,” he said.

“If you are asking people to pay more money in income tax then it becomes harder for us to charge more for the services we provide, for example access to sports facilities.”

Meanwhile, Richard Thomson, the leader of the SNP-Labour opposition group, said it was “disappointing” a consensus had not been reached nationally.

And while he acknowledged the benefits of ring-fencing, he also warned that it could be to the detriment of other services that needed funding.

He said: “While ring-fenced funding leads to a real focus in those areas being ring-fenced, the risk is that it’s at the expense of other areas of council services. In my view, we need to be focusing on outcomes more rather than inputs – the best way to do that is to have greater local discretion over how to deliver on national priorities.

“While we’ve heard plenty from the SNP’s political opponents about the need to have more resources in the local government settlement for Aberdeenshire, there has been a complete lack of honesty about from where that extra resource should be taken.

“Continued Westminster austerity and the threat of a no-deal Brexit means that there is no magic money tree out there. Frankly, if Conservative or Lib Dem councillors want to will the end of more money for local government, they need to also will the means. They should be urging their MSP colleagues to stop their posturing over the budget, to face up to some tough choices of their own and engage seriously in talks.”