Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Woman raped in Aberdeen park says police questioned her about dating app use

Rape victim Katie Johnston backs the proposals.
Rape victim Katie Johnston backs the proposals.

A woman who was brutally raped in an Aberdeen park claims that police thought she had gone to meet her attacker – because she had a dating app on her phone.

Katie Johnston was grabbed from a bench, then dragged into bushes and attacked in Union Terrace Gardens in January 2016.

During their investigation the 25-year-old, who has waived her right to anonymity so that she can speak out, handed her phone over to officers.

She was told they were checking for fingerprints on the device which could help them track down her assailant.

But Miss Johnston said she felt that when police noticed she had dating app Tinder installed, they thought she might have gone to the park for the purpose of meeting someone for sex.

She said: “When officers first asked me if it was OK if they took my phone, they said it was down to me and my decision.

“They wanted to use certain chemicals to see if there were other fingerprints on my phone.

“But because at the time I had Tinder, they initially thought I had gone there to meet someone.

‘It took two days of questioning for me to prove I wasn’t there to meet someone – at the start it was awful.”

But police have said there was “no suggestion” from officers that Miss Johnston had gone to the park to meet someone

After an 18-month probe they apprehended attacker Alasdair McDonald, who was convicted of rape at trial and sentenced to 10 years behind bars.

Inspector Sheila McDerment said: “As is standard practice as part of rape investigations, the victim’s phone, and investigation into any social media platforms she had been using to communicate, formed part of inquiries.

“We carried out painstaking inquiries over several months to establish the full set of circumstances surrounding this incident and there was nothing to suggest any contact between the victim in this case with the suspect or anyone else before the incident occurred.

“We fully understand the investigation is a difficult process for victims to go through however we have specialist trained officers to assist with this and to make the process as easy as possible.”

The law in England and Wales

Victims of rape and sexual assault in England and Wales are now being asked to hand their phones over to police or risk their case not being taken forward.

Standardised forms have been rolled out asking people reporting crimes to grant permission for their messages, social media posts and photographs to be accessed by officers.

It follows a string of cases which collapsed due to the emergence of last-minute evidence released during trials, with the new scheme designed to allow facts to be disclosed earlier.

Prosecutors said it will close a gap in the law which means police are unable to force people to hand over smart devices for examination, and added that it will be only be used when necessary.

But the move has been criticised by organisations including the Centre for Women’s Justice and charity Big Brother Watch, which likened it to a “digital strip search”.

The director of public prosecutions said it would only be looked at when necessary, but the move has been criticised by organisations including the Centre for Women’s Justice and civil liberties charity Big Brother Watch.

Miss Johnston said: “Victims are already scared about having to relive what happened to them when they speak to the police before having to go to court to relive it again, and now they are getting their possessions taken away too?”

She added: “It’s just another hurdle to justice – just another thing that might stop people coming forward.

“It is like victims are being treated as if they are a suspect.”