Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Outcry as health bosses still haven’t launched review into overnight closure of minor injury unit

(L TO R) COUNCILLOR GLEN REYNOLDS, COMMUNITY COUNCILLOR ROBERT MCARTHUR AND COUNCILLOR ROSS CASSIE.
(L TO R) COUNCILLOR GLEN REYNOLDS, COMMUNITY COUNCILLOR ROBERT MCARTHUR AND COUNCILLOR ROSS CASSIE.

Health chiefs have come under fire for failing to launch a review into the impact of closing a north-east service overnight, despite taking the controversial step months ago.

Aberdeenshire Health and Social Care Partnership started a review of the region’s minor injury units (MIUs) in 2018.

It recommended that the hours of four facilities be cut, including at Chalmers Hospital in Banff.

At the end of last year the hours were changed, but part of the agreement was for a review to be carried out over six months to assess the impact of the move on the community.

Yesterday, at a meeting of the Banff and Buchan area committee, it emerged that the review is yet to begin.

Banff and District councillor, Glen Reynolds, asked partnership manager Mark Simpson to explain the scope of the review and Mr Simpson revealed that he did not know what it would consist of.

Mr Simpson said only that officers were collecting feedback and clinical data but said his team had not yet been told what was expected of them.

Mr Reynolds said he found it “extraordinary but not surprising” that the study had not begun.

Committee chairman, Andy Kille, said: “It’s a very good question, we’re halfway through and you don’t know how it’s being gauged.”

Councillor Ross Cassie claimed the partnership had been ignoring his letters of concern on behalf of residents.

Yesterday, he said: “Throughout the whole process the partnership has been avoiding scrutiny and, despite publicly telling the Press and Journal that it would, the partnership has never responded to my concerns.

“I appreciate there will be a review, which they don’t have a clue what it will look like, but I bet it will say ‘since we made the changes everything is hunky dory’ when it’s not.”

Mr Simpson responded: “We have been as transparent as possible and made everything public.”