Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Chester Hotel rooftop expansion plans withdrawn after planners recommend refusal

City planners have recommended the Chester Hotel's planning application is refused.
City planners have recommended the Chester Hotel's planning application is refused.

A luxury Aberdeen hotel has withdrawn plans for an ambitious extension that would have created a rooftop dining terrace.

The Chester Hotel said it would instead focus on the business’ Covid recovery after city planners recommended the proposal be rejected over noise concerns.

Bosses at the hotel, on Queens Road, lodged their plan last year after finding a “surprising” number of customers were willing to meet outside.

They said it would help them to better serve people during the pandemic, with coronavirus restrictions more relaxed for outdoor hospitality than inside.

Neighbours, however, lodged more than 40 objections and the council’s planning committee was due to have the final say on Thursday.

"The

Ahead of that meeting, however, Stephen Gow, general manager of the Chester Hotel, said yesterday: “We are withdrawing this application at this time.

“Our business currently faces the not insignificant challenges of reopening the hotel following a third period of enforced closure and our efforts will be operationally focused on this for the foreseeable future.”

Why did planners recommend refusal?

City planners had issued a 14-page report recommending the application be refused.

"The

It references a noise assessment which says any increase in sound levels for neighbours would be “negligible,” assuming doors to the restaurant remain closed.

But environmental health experts warned a number of restrictions would also be required to ensure this.

These would have included a 60-customer limit, a ban on amplified music and use only between 8-10.10pm, as this was the only data provided in the application.

Planners say these measures would not be enforceable, noting: “It is not considered that planning conditions could reasonably be used to limit the rooftop space to use for exclusively dining purposes, given the effect of the overarching lawful hotel use which would provide for any activity that might reasonably be expected to take place within a hotel.”

They said the opening hours proposed might be “unduly restrictive,” with a need to keep doors closed “practically difficult” to enforce during period periods.

The report adds: “The submitted noise assessments give some indication that noise levels experienced at the closest neighbouring residential properties would not be excessive.

“However, the information is not sufficient to support the hours of operation sought by the applicants and the proposal cannot be made acceptable through the use of reasonable planning conditions.”

The report adds: “In the event that planning permission were to be granted, the planning authority would have no control over the actual number of people who could use the terrace or the activity which could take place there.

“In theory any activity which one would expect to reasonably take place within a hotel, could take place without planning permission, as long as no further physical development was undertaken.

“For example, activities such as outside drinking and dining, the conducting of weddings or taking of wedding photos, or smoking, could legitimately take place on the terrace.”