Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Aberdeen man ordered to chop down huge hedge that blocked neighbour’s satellite TV signal

The hedge at the centre of the dispute. Picture by Katie Paterson
The hedge at the centre of the dispute. Picture by Katie Paterson

An Aberdeen man has been ordered to chop down a 36ft hedge after neighbours complained it was blocking their TV signal.

Fed-up residents on King’s Gate said the leylandii belonging to company director Robert Shand, 77, made their lives a misery.

Richard Abraham teamed up with fellow neighbours to seek a legal remedy to their woes.

High hedge law

They attempted to use high hedge legislation to have the shrubbery cut down to size, but were left dismayed when Aberdeen City Council rejected the move last year.

Mr Shand’s £560,000 detached property is surrounded by trees but his increasingly exasperated neighbours insisted they formed a “solid wall” which denied their homes light and made it impossible to grow plants and grass in their gardens.

Residents said the hedge growth has caused problems

An attempt to have the feud brought to an end through mediation also failed when Mr Shand’s wife, Brenda, said that they did not wish to participate.

The four neighbours then took their fight to the Scottish Government in a last-ditch bid to have action taken on the trees.

Government has final say

A government reporter has now quashed the council decision and ordered the trees be chopped down to 8ft in height.

In his letter to the council pleading for the local authority to take action, Mr Abraham outlined the predicament the residents were left facing.

He said: “Some time ago, a line of continuous semi-evergreen trees were planted as a boundary.

“These have been allowed to grow unchecked for a while now and now reach a height of over 10m, forming a continuous line of inter-grown hedge that creates a complete barrier to sunlight.

“While we respect the wishes of Mr and Mrs Shand to privacy, we believe that the current state of growth is unreasonable.

Residents said the hedge has blocked light to their gardens and blocked satellite signals

“We are unable to grow plants on our patio and had to replace our lawn with paving as the grass kept dying due to lack of sun.

“It unduly encloses our view and creates an oppressive environment through being disproportionate in height compared to our garden space.

“It blocks our satellite signal to the extent we have had to move the dish twice as the trees continue to grow.”

Winter was made even bleaker

A letter sent by another neighbour said: “Light would be greatly improved upon in the summer months and light of any portion is very welcome during the short days of an Aberdeen winter.

“This is a clear case of putting the owner’s privacy claims above the suffering he is forcing on the applicants.

“Should the owner feel his many large mature trees that dominate the area of garden offer insufficient privacy to some portion of his garden, he is of course free to plant more, hopefully less offensive, trees.

“The height of the high hedge clearly reduces light levels as it is a solid wall.”

Hedge owner feared loss of privacy

Mr Shand claimed cutting the trees down would result in a loss of privacy and insisted that some of the trees in his garden had protected status.

He said: “Our garden is full of trees, many of which are over 100 years old and are of protected status.

“In addition there are a small number of conifer trees, which are the subject of the complaint.

The trees reach 36ft high

“We would thus point out that the trimming of the conifer trees would have little or no effect on light levels as the many beech, sycamore, holly, horse chestnut etc trees cannot be trimmed and are in fact three to four metres taller than the conifer trees.

“In addition we would highlight that many of the tenants in the flats have balconies and a number also have roof balconies.

“If the conifer trees were trimmed, this would have a significant effect on our privacy as the balconies and roof gardens overlook our garden.”

Council dismissed complaints

Aberdeen City Council claimed the issues raised by the neighbours were “unlikely” to be resolved by reducing the height of the leylandii and said a reduction would not have an impact over summer months.

Ordering the trees be lopped, government reporter Stuart West said: “Taking all matters into consideration, including the 2019 Guidance, I conclude that the high hedge has an adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighbouring domestic properties in relation to light loss and amenity due to the scale and overbearing nature of the high hedge.

“I have taken all matters raised into account and, on balance, there is nothing which would justify not taking action in relation to the high hedge. I therefore uphold the appeal and issue the attached high hedge notice.”

Mr Shand has until the end of September to carry out work to reduce the height of his hedge.