Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Two north-east care homes ordered to improve after inspections showed lack of leadership

Two care homes run by The Richmond Fellowship Scotland have been asked to improve following inspection
Two care homes run by The Richmond Fellowship Scotland have been asked to improve following inspection

Two Aberdeenshire care homes run by one of Scotland’s largest social care providers have failed to impress inspectors.

The Care Inspectorate made unannounced visits to two of The Richmond Fellowship Scotland’s services in Alford on May 12.

Inspectors flagged concerns about a lack of leadership at both the charity’s care home and supported living service, while highlighting that residents at the former were bored – and being put at risk of infection due to a lack of good PPE practice.

They rated Alford Care Home as “weak” and the Richmond Fellowship Scotland – Aberdeenshire’s supported living service, also in Alford, as “adequate”.

Both now have until June 28 to make improvements.

Alford Care Home, run by Richmond Fellowship Trust. Picture by Scott Baxter

Lack of leadership at Alford Care Home hitting morale

Alford Care Home offers support for 12 individuals with mental health problems and physical impairments. The residents live in three purpose-built bungalows close to each other, and are supported round-the-clock.

Inspectors rated it as weak, and said the lack of leadership was causing issues, particularly around staff taking responsibility, or learning from, mistakes.

Concern was also raised around PPE not being used or stored properly, and “unclean areas” which could increase the risk of passing on Covid or other infections.

The report states: “There was not a consistent and reliable management presence. There was a lack of analysis of incidents and limited efforts made to learn from situations when people were at risk of harm.

“Details of legal aspects such as guardianship were not easily identifiable, which could lead to mistakes being made about who has responsibility for making decisions. There were no clear and positive strategies to guide staff in the best way to support people who were distressed.

“We saw mistakes and the staff culture was not positive and enthusiastic. This was lowering the standard of care for people.”

Resident claims personal alarm taken away due to ‘overuse’

Inspectors also spoke to a range of residents and felt they were left bored in their rooms with “nothing to do”.

One resident told them they “don’t do much”.

Another resident also complained that staff had taken away their personal alarm due to “overuse”.

The resident told them: “At night, I have to pull my cord for toilet and staff don’t always come and I have to wait a long time.

“I did have a personal alarm but they removed it from me as I was overusing it – it makes it harder for me without it.”

Richmond Fellowship Scotland – Aberdeenshire. Picture by Scott Baxter

Supported living team create ‘relaxed atmosphere’ – but leadership lacking

Meanwhile at the combined care at home and housing support service known as The Richmond Fellowship Scotland – Aberdeenshire, inspectors praised the care and attention residents were given to ensure they were not bored.

The service was rated “adequate” overall, with inspectors also happy with the supply and use of PPE.

However, similar concerns about leadership were raised, with inspectors noting “there was not a consistent and reliable management presence.”

As well as those within the accommodation, staff support a number of people in their own homes within the area.

The report said: “We found people’s health and wellbeing was supported to a good standard. There was a lovely, relaxed atmosphere when staff were with people.

“People were engaged throughout the day with their own daily living tasks and with hobbies and leisure interests which meant they were not bored or isolated.

“People told us that staff had time to support and care for them. All staff had completed relevant training. This meant people could be confident that they would be correctly looked after.”

“Not operating at the level we would expect”

The inspection report on the Alford Care Home said that the home is currently “not operating at the level we would expect.”

Both care homes have been given a deadline of June 28 to improve the competence of its leadership and staff.

Among other requirements, they must ensure that “all people are suitably supported and engaged in activity,” “people live in a clean and well maintained home” and “a stable management and leadership team is in place.”

A spokesman for the Richmond Fellowship Scotland said: “We are working with the services to bring about the high quality standards that we expect and achieve across Scotland.”