Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Beloved Stonehaven public park could be given away for just £1 – despite 1,100-strong petition

Forest Park
Residents in Stonehaven had launched a bid to save the town's Forest Park. Image: Kath Flannery/DC Thomson.

Plans to turn a public park in Stonehaven into a training ground for a rugby club have been recommended for approval – despite a 1,100-strong petition opposing the proposals.

Mackie Rugby Football Club first lodged a proposal to acquire the land at Forest Drive in July last year amid fears it could be forced to fold unless they secure a new site.

The club, which has been the main provider for local rugby players for 46 years, had previously leased two pitches at Redcloak – one of which has recently been terminated.

They are now hoping to gain ownership of Forest Park and build two new pitches, a training area and gym, clubhouse, changing rooms and storage facilities at the site.

But locals have also raised concerns this would lead to the loss of their only green space – cutting off families from a “beloved park at the heart of their community”.

Despite the concerns, more than 200 have also written to back the proposals.

Forest Park deemed ‘suitable site’

A community asset transfer request submitted to Aberdeenshire Council states the park was specifically chosen after it was deemed the most suitable location for the project.

A report written by the authority’s director of environment and infrastructure services, Alan Wood, said: “They had explored a number of potential sites with private landowners and developers but had so far not been able to secure suitable land.

Pictured is Lynne Kelly who uses the park every day and doesn’t want to lose it. Picture by Kath Flannery/DCT Media.

“As any new site would probably require ground works to create suitable pitches and associated infrastructure then time was of the essence to find a new site which could be developed.

“If the rugby club is unable to find an alternative site then there is a serious risk that they may have to fold which would have a negative impact on the hundreds of children and adults who currently play the sport.”

If the proposal is approved, the club will take ownership of the park for just £1 – despite it being valued at over £65,000 – due to the “potential community benefit it presents”.

Campaign to stop Forest Park development

According to the blueprints, local residents will still be able to use the pitches outside of training hours and there will be a designated path for park users and dog walkers.

But hundreds of people have gone up in arms against the project to highlight the negative impact it would have on disabled and elderly residents, who use the park on a regular basis.

Residents in Stonehaven at Forest Park which could be transferred to Mackie RFC
Residents in Stonehaven have launched a petition to prevent the development from taking place – gathering nearly 1,200 signatures. Picture by Kath Flannery/DCT Media.

They have also raised concerns over potential increase in traffic congestion and pollution, as well as noise disturbance to neighbouring homes.

In total, the community asset transfer request has received 372 comments, of which 167 are objecting to the proposal with 205 in support.

Park users have also started a Save Forest Drive Park campaign to put a halt on the development, with a petition outlining their worries having amassed 1,165 signatures.

‘We need more open green spaces – not less’

Campaigner David Officer said: “I use this park regularly for running, walking my dog, playing football with the kids and even flying kites as a family. The proposals will put an end to that.

“The rugby club say they will retain a path around the park for walking and exercising dogs, but it will be a very different experience walking along a narrow path between high fences, than walking through a large green park.

“We need more publicly owned and managed green spaces for our health and wellbeing – not less, and it is outrageous that this asset transfer is being recommended for approval.

“I hope councillors will share my view and reject this recommendation so that the community around Forest Park, Brickfield and wider Stonehaven can retain this important green space for everyone to use.”

The application for the asset transfer of Forest Park will be discussed by councillors at the Kincardine and Mearns area committee meeting on June 14.

Conversation