Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Controversial village expansion in north-east could go ahead despite objections

Boddam
Boddam

A controversial plan for nine homes in a north-east village has been recommended for approval by Aberdeenshire Council officials, despite objections from community leaders.

The proposal for Inchmore Gardens in Boddam, which will be discussed by the Buchan area committee next week, has been tabled by Inverurie-based architects William Lippe Ltd.

The local authority’s director of infrastructure services Stephen Archer said in a report that the plan, in principle, is “wholly compliant” with council policy.

In the report, he adds: “The site is considered to be appropriate and technically adequate of accommodating nine houses.

“It is noted that for the development to be a success and ensure minimal impact upon residential amenity, an appropriate layout and appropriately designed dwellings will need to be proposed.”

But the village’s community council has hit out at the proposal.

Concerns have been raised over access to the development and the impact it will have upon existing buildings.

The community council has also raised safety fears regarding a local boy who they say needs a “secure and safe” environment due to a disability.

“If the fence to this (his) property was removed for construction work this boy would have access to the nearby cliffs and other dangers.

“We feel this site is not large enough for proposed development and would have a detrimental effect on the surrounding properties. Also this land is often waterlogged,” a statement added.

No one from William Lippe Architects was available to comment on the concerns last night.