Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Aberdeen support worker who invited client to ‘sleepover’ is struck off

Carers talking on a couch with the person they are supporting.
Reach for the stars when it comes to getting the best support for loved ones, says Susan Grigor an unpaid carer from Nairn. Image: Shutterstock.

An Aberdeen recovery support worker who invited a female client to her home for a “sleepover” has been struck off.

During a Scottish Social Services Council (SSSC) hearing, Gillian Cortmann was found to be unfit to practise after she also borrowed money, accepted gifts and shared her own personal information.

Cortmann, a support worker in a care at home service, was removed from the register today.

Breaking support worker and client boundaries, she also added the client on Facebook, and asked her to lie to managers about where she was when she was staying at Cortmann’s home.

Cortmann was charged with 15 offences, each of which broke the SSSC code of practice.

What were the 15 charges?

SSSC decided there was evidence that while employed as a recovery worker in Aberdeen, and during the course of that employment between 2017 and October 9 2019, that Cortmann committed the following acts.

  1. Borrowed £20
  2. Borrowed £30
  3. Borrowed £25 or £30
  4. Borrowed £25 from client and failed to repay this
  5. Gave your personal mobile number the client
  6. Added the client as a friend on Facebook
  7. Sent messages to the client from your personal mobile number
  8. Accept curtains, mugs, pans, a table lamp and ornaments from the client
  9. Accept a gift of glasses from the client
  10. On an exact date unknown in or around September 2019 invite to your house for coffee
  11. On an exact date unknown in or around September 2019 invite the client to sleepover at your house
  12. Tell the client, she could tell your employer that she was staying with a friend and that no one would know
  13. Prior to borrowing money from the client share personal information with the client
  14. Send messages via Facebook messenger to the client
  15. Cause distress to the client by your actions

Crossed personal boundaries

Between 2017 and October 9, 2019, Cortmann borrowed at least £100 from her client on four occasions, one of which she failed to repay.

Prior to borrowing the money, she shared extensive private information with her client.

Details of what she shared was not shared in a report into the hearing, published by the SSSC today.

Cortmann was also found to have added the client as a friend on Facebook and gave her personal mobile number to her.

The support worker accepted curtains, mugs, pans, a table lamp, ornaments and a gift of glasses from the client.

In September 2019, she invited the client to her house for coffee, and then in the same month she asked her to have a sleepover.

Cortmann then told the client to say she was “staying with a friend.”

The report said: “You took advantage of a vulnerable service user who was known to you and you repeatedly abused your position of trust.

“Your behaviour mostly took place while you were working and meant to be caring for and looking after the needs of a vulnerable service user.

It continued: “Your behaviour was deliberate and constitutes an abuse of trust of the relationship between a service user and a registered worker.

“Your actions demonstrate a pattern of behaviour which is attitudinal in nature and raises concerns over your values.”

‘No factors in Cortmann’s favour’

“Your behaviour placed a service user at risk of emotional harm and some of your behaviour caused the service user distress,” it concluded.

The hearing found “no factors” in Cortmann’s favour.

After the online hearing, it was found that Cortmann had failed to follow guidance in the SSSC Code of Practice for Social Service Workers.

As such, it was decided to issue a removal order notice. Cortmann had an opportunity to raise an appeal but has not done so.

Conversation