Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Coastguard helicopter avoided collision with microlight near Cruden Bay by altering course, report reveals

A Sikorsky S-92 search and rescue helicopter was involved in the incident. Image: Maritime and Coastguard Agency/PA Wire.
A Sikorsky S-92 search and rescue helicopter was involved in the incident. Image: Maritime and Coastguard Agency/PA Wire.

A Coastguard search and rescue helicopter feared a head on collision with a microlight over Aberdeenshire, an official probe has revealed.

The Sikorsky 92 (S92) helicopter was flying at 2,300ft, north of Cruden Bay, when the incident occurred on July 31 last year.

The pilot said they had been warned by air traffic control there was possible traffic, which might be a drone, in the area.

As a precaution, they altered course to further inland and maintained height to allow separation from what might have been a drone from Cruden Bay – which was not due to be above 1,300ft. The captain asked the crew to maintain good lookout.

A microlight was spotted in their “nine o’clock” within 1,093 yards and around 100ft above. The microlight was seen to alter course to the right from its apparent converging heading, but it was too late for the S92 pilot to react.

Image: Airprox Board

Pilots’ actions prevented collision

The report on the incident to the UK Airprox Board, which investigates near misses, has now been published.

In their findings, they said: “The pilot opined that, had they (the microlight) not altered course earlier just in case, this could easily have resulted in a different outcome. The pilot assessed the risk of collision as ‘Medium’.”

The pilot of the microlight said they first saw the helicopter two or three miles ahead on their port side. It was crossing their flight path so they turned to port to remain clear.

The pilot assessed the risk of collision as “none”.

The board agreed the actions taken by both pilots, together with the separation between the two aircraft, had been sufficient to ensure that there had been no risk of collision.

Investigators added: “Although the (microlight) pilot had had no prior knowledge about the S92, they had seen the other aircraft at range and assessed that there had been no risk of collision.”

Conversation