Will a modern glass building help draw crowds back into the city centre? Or would such a design be a disgrace to Aberdeen’s granite roots?
Revised plans for the new Aberdeen Market have become a talking point among our readers, as many ponder over the council’s updated proposals.
The latest architect drawings of the multi-million-pound city centre site have posed yet more questions about how exactly the new development should look.
At the heart of the heated debate stands the market’s Union Street entrance and Aberdeen’s heritage of granite buildings.
And as opponents battle on social media, you can vote in our poll below to have your say.Â
What are the two designs?
The Aberdeen Market proposals came to the forefront again last week after heritage groups branded the new designs as “disrespectful” due to the lack of granite.
Halliday Fraser Munro, the council’s architects, had initially suggested it would be best to keep the framework of the former BHS store and add a glazed front on top.
Slide left and right to see the changes in the design.
However, they later tweaked the designs – which now include demolishing the structure and replacing it with an all-glass panel to allow views through the market.
The changes have split opinion, sparking a debate whether the city’s new development should be built in a “modern” or “traditional” style.
‘We don’t want another monstrosity’
Some readers think the proposed building would become an “eyesore” on Union Street, while others said the design is “a travesty” and “a disgrace”.
Robin McIntosh wrote: “Usual architects’ rubbish regards to heritage elements – a big bit of glass is not going to ‘draw more visitors’.
“It’s a lazy way to homogenise the street, which will slowly start to look like every other high street.”
Jeff Fraser added: “Even if it isn’t granite it should at least have some sensitivity in design, which this does not.
“Don’t want a repeat of that monstrosity at Triple Kirks that completely enclosed the original church tower and doesn’t match the material of anything around it.”
‘It’s time to embrace the changes’
However, others backed the “modern” design and likened it to developments in other “progressive” cities such as Berlin and Paris.
Anna-Maija Rist wrote: “Nordic cities have beautiful modern glass and steel buildings next to more traditional ones. They enhance each other.”
Wilma Collie echoed her words: “I’m all for keeping our history alive, but we have to move on. Maybe it’s time to embrace the changes.”
What do you prefer? Share your views in our comments section below after voting
Martin Ross agreed: “Go into every other city in Scotland and you get lots of different and innovative building designs. Come to Aberdeen and what do you get? Dull and boring.”
Meanwhile, Aberdeen businessman Richard Tinto said: “Dammed if you do, dammed if you don’t. Let’s get it built and enjoy the vibe.”
Take part in our poll and have your say
You can read more on what historians had to say about the development here, and see the revised plans for yourself here.
Conversation