Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Debate on rejected 400-home Banchory development rages on

The plans for Braehead, on the south end of Banchory
The plans for Braehead, on the south end of Banchory

Developers and protesters are embroiled in a fresh row over plans for 400 new houses near a Deeside town.

Councillors rejected Sandlaw Farming’s proposals for 300 rented homes, 75 affordable properties and 25 assisted-living apartments near Scolty Hill at Braehead, south of Banchory.

But an appeal against the decision – made last week – has already been lodged with the Scottish Government.

And objectors fear the move could undermine the planning process.

Members of Stop Scolty Redevelopment accused the firm of acting in an “aggressive” way.

But last night Ken Ross, of Ross Developments – which is agent for Sandlaw Farming – said it was the company’s “democratic right” to appeal.

Local councillors said last week that the proposals at Braehead “just wouldn’t work”, and the plans attracted about 500 objections from Deeside residents.

Spokesman for Stop Scolty Redevelopment, Mike Adams, said: “We are obviously disappointed that Sandlaw Farming has immediately indicated their intention to appeal the decision.

“This will not be because of an issue with the process that took place, but simply because they don’t like the result.

“The idea that a developer automatically appeals every decision when they don’t like the result is promoting a ‘development at any cost attitude’.

“Fortunately, we do not have a developer-led planning process, but a plan-led process whereby local communities, planning departments, independent organisations and developers come together to allow the council to make decisions in the best interests of the wider community.

“We strongly believe that these local planning decisions should remain in the hands of the local planning authority.”

However, Mr Ross said: “It is a democratic process and we have the right under the legislation to appeal if we think it is appropriate.

“They are attempting to prejudice the situation just now by suggesting that we are being aggressive. We are exercising democratic rights, it isn’t being aggressive.

“Like they have a right to object, we have a right to object as well. It is a democratic process.

“We do think there is a need for the proposed development.”