Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Council turns down petition asking for Marischal Square project to be scrapped

How Marischal Square might look
How Marischal Square might look

Aberdeen City Council has refused to publish an e-petition on its website calling for contracts to be scrapped that will bring the Marischal Square project to life.

City resident, Bill Skidmore, had lodged an application to the local authority urging it to host a petition to “cancel” contracts with developer, Muse, and investors, Aviva.

If successful, it could have given opponents – like him – the chance to bring the £107million Muse Developments hotel, office and retail plan to the council’s Petitions Committee, which could have explored his request.

Mr Skidmore said he had ensured all 14 criteria were adhered to in ensuring his application was not turned down, including one which rules that a petition cannot be hosted by the council when a decision has been taken on it in the previous 12 months.

He said that because Muse was accepted as the preferred bidder for the project in May 2013, and the hotel operator picked in June last year, his petition should have been accepted.

But last night, he was told that because the development had been brought to full council in March after the SNP called for a halt to it, his application had been turned down.

A heated debate on the project on March 5 culminated in the Labour-led administration narrowly fending off an attempt from its opponents to force a rethink by 22-21.

Last night, Mr Skidmore said he did not accept the council’s rejection as the full council had not taken any decision on investment in March- which is what his latest petition was focused on.

“The word ‘investment’ does not appear in the minutes of the meeting held on March 5,” he said.

“Therefore, their rejection of the petition is spurious and contrived.”

He also said it had taken the council 22 working days to come up with its “flimsy” reason for rejection, and would be appealing the decision.

“They simply do not want the petition on their website,” he said.

Last night, an Aberdeen City Council spokesman reiterated to the Press and Journal that the petition, quite simply, did not meet the criteria for acceptance.