Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Daviot crematorium REFUSED over fears noise from trailer neighbour would ‘destroy’ funerals

Developers had argued the facility was needed to address a growing demand for cremations over burials and meet "insufficient" capacity in Aberdeenshire.

Councillors voted to refuse the proposed crematorium at Daviot. Image: McWilliam Lippe Architects
Councillors voted to refuse the proposed crematorium at Daviot. Image: McWilliam Lippe Architects

Controversial plans for a multi-million pound crematorium near Daviot have been refused after a months-long battle between locals and the developer.

Tensions have been escalating since Fraser Milne, who owns Inverurie Garden Centre, lodged plans for the facility with Aberdeenshire Council last year.

It was to be built on land right next to the Stewart Trailers manufacturing site, and prompted scores of objections.

Inverurie businessman Fraser Fraser with his wife Janelle. Image: Kirstie Topp/DC Thomson

In total, 84 residents submitted letters to the local authority asking for the proposal to be thrown out.

The venue was designed to have a central chapel with capacity for 144 mourners looking out to Bennachie.

The Stewart Agricultural Limited site at Daviot with the proposed crematorium ground behind it. Image supplied by George F. Green

And, the development would have included a garden of remembrance and reflective pool for mourners to grieve for their lost loved ones.

Plans discussed for a THIRD time after council stalemate

The proposal had previously gone before councillors twice but had divided opinion.

The central chapel would have looked out to Bennachie. Image: McWilliam Lippe Architects

Members of the Formartine area committee sided against the plan, while their counterparts in Garioch wanted to see the crematorium go ahead.

As they remained at odds, the application went to the infrastructure services committee today for a final decision…

What was the argument FOR the Daviot crematorium?

Kellas planning director Lesley Tierney attended the meeting to speak on behalf of Mr Milne.

She argued the facility was needed due to a growing demand for cremations over burials.

She noted Aberdeenshire had an aging population and its death rate was expected to rise by 16% over the next decade.

The proposed crematorium at Daviot. Image: McWilliam Lippe Architects

But, she said there was “insufficient” crematorium capacity in the region to meet the forecasted demand.

And, Ms Tierney said the “ambitious and respectful” development would have no harmful impact on the surrounding area.

The planning chief argued that the site would generate “no additional pollution beyond normal standards” and emissions would be dispersed within the site.

Finally, addressing noise concerns around the neighbouring industrial site, she said: “Continued operations at Stewart Trailers will not be prejudiced.”

Could the crematorium have been built anywhere else?

She told the chamber that other locations had been considered across the region, with two alternative sites identified at Ellon and Inverurie.

However, the Inverurie site in particular was ruled out as it would have been next to an abbatoir, something Ms Tierney noted was “not desirable”.

Artist impression of the proposed crematorium at Daviot
Artist impression of the proposed crematorium at Daviot. Image: McWilliam Lippe Architects

But both sites were ultimately dropped as they would have been much closer to more people and more businesses.

Ms Tierney added: “To put it somewhere else would bring with it potentially greater environmental or amenity concerns.”

What about road safety?

Road safety concerns were also flagged during the meeting.

Mid Formartine councillor Paul Johnston queried the applicant’s claims the B9001 was quiet and safe.

The red arrow points to the proposed crematorium site near Daviot. Image: Aberdeenshire Council

“The road is national speed limit which means that you can expect cars to be at 66 or less miles per hour and that is quite a speed.

“The volume and speed of traffic has to be taken into account.”

However, Mr Fraser’s solicitor Stephen Park argued that Aberdeenshire Council’s roads team had “exhaustively” checked the plans and had not objected to it.

Stewart Trailers ‘could suffer same fate as Edinburgh Tattoo’

Brodies solicitor Elaine Farquharson-Black spoke on behalf of Stewart Trailers.

She told the chamber that the site was “uniquely unsuitable” for a number of reasons, but focused on the threat the crematorium had on the firm.

“Manufacturing trailers is a noisy business,” she said.

“It involves welding, shotblasting, metal fabrication work… There are forklifts and heavy vehicular movements within the site.”

Staff hard at work at Stewart Trailers. Image: Kami Thomson/DC Thomson

Ms Farquharson-Black revealed Stewart Trailers carried out its own noise assessment which showed sound levels would be higher than those submitted by the applicants.

“My clients’ survey highlights that the noise levels in the remembrance garden could be 20 to 30 decibels higher than the applicants suggested.”

Ms Farquharson-Black argued that the noise survey carried out by Stewart Trailers suggested that the sound levels were high enough that complaints would be “likely”.

The Royal Edinburgh Military Tattoo of the Red Arrows during their aerobatic display over Edinburgh for The Royal Edinburgh Military Tattoo at Edinburgh Castle Esplanade. Image: Ian Georgeson/The Royal Edinburgh Military Tattoo/PA Wire

She also worried that recurring complaints would lead the firm to change the way they carry out their business.

The solicitor referred to the Edinburgh Tattoo flypasts being scaled back after residents had complained about “terrifying” noise.

“It doesn’t matter that the Edinburgh Tattoo was there first, they had a noise complaint against them and that’s the concern that we have,” she explained.

Trailer firm didn’t want to ‘destroy’ funerals

Trailer boss James Stewart also attended the meeting at Woodhill House in Aberdeen.

Defending his business, he said: “We do our best to mitigate noise but it will happen.”

Mandy and James Stewart of Stewart Trailers. Image: Kami Thomson/DC Thomson

He added: “At some point, there will be someone requiring a two-minute silence and we drop a chunk of steel.

“Those two things will line up one day and will destroy someone’s funeral which we don’t want to be responsible for.

“Our greatest concern is that we are going about our normal business, which we have been for 30 years without any problems, and all of a sudden we will be curtailed by a very noise sensitive building right next to us.”

What did councillors have to say?

Mid Formartine councillor Derek Ritchie urged members to refuse the application.

He believed the B9001 road was “not fit for purpose” and claimed it was the “wrong place” for the development as it would be too close to Stewart Trailers.

“It would be beyond belief to imagine that a business using raw steel could do this quietly,” he said.

A site plan of the proposed Daviot crematorium, with Stewart Trailers visible next door. Image: McWilliam Lippe Architects

“A crematorium needs to be a place of absolute silence and dignity, a place where loved ones say a final goodbye to their cherished dear departed or to visit the garden of remembrance.”

Councillor Ritchie added: “The building looks good but location is so important.”

However, infrastructure chairman councillor Alan Turner backed the planners’ recommendations and was “content” to see the plan be approved.

The matter resulted in a vote, but the application was refused by 10 to four.


Read more:

Conversation