Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Councillors recommend blocking controversial travellers camp

The site at Springhill, near Peterhead.
The site at Springhill, near Peterhead.

North-east councillors have recommended blocking the use of a temporary travellers camp near Peterhead.

Buchan area committee met yesterday morning to discuss proposals for a stopover site at Springhill, south of the coastal community.

The scheme – which was tabled by a local family last year – would allow the four-pitch site to be used on a temporary basis for one year to prove its viability.

Planners previously backed the proposal, but local councillors were left unconvinced.

They were asked to pass their comments on the plan to the authority for the next meeting of the full council, when a final decision will be made.

Stephen Smith said the traveller site, which has already been part-built without permission, was not “entirely suitable” for the local area.

He added: “I would have to say I don’t think the case has been made for approval.

“I think there’s also an issue with the proximity of existing properties in the area. I don’t think it’s entirely suitable.”

Chairman Stuart Pratt added that he found it “difficult” to agree with planners, echoing Mr Smith’s comments.

A spokesman for the planning service who was present at the meeting said that the service backed approval for the site because it was for a family’s private use.

He added: “If family members are not using that site, that should not be the case.”

He concluded that if the plan was refused at full council, the process would be the same as any other refused planning application, where the respondent would have three months to appeal.

Councillors had agreed to carry out a site visit to Springhill last month ahead of yesterday’s meeting.

The scheme has proved unpopular with neighbouring residents and a total of six objections were received by the planning team.