Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Future of Macduff harbour could be overshadowed by Nigg development

Macduff Harbour
Macduff Harbour

Aberdeenshire Council is concerned that a £50million redevelopment of Macduff harbour could be overshadowed by a much larger flagship project in Aberdeen.

Last year, a study into the future of the Macduff port facilities was published, and two options are being reviewed.

The first is the creation of a new basin at the cost of £50million. The idea was first proposed in the 1930s, but never materialised.

A cheaper option is to deepen the three existing harbour basins and create a new pier head, at a cost of £15million.

Both options are under consideration after last year’s independent study concluded both the harbour and town would “flourish” as a result of the investment.

But, in a new report to Banff and Buchan councillors, Aberdeenshire Council’s roads and landscape chief Philip McKay has warned the £415million harbour development at Nigg Bay, south of Aberdeen, could impact on demand for harbour space in the region.

He said: “Major port infrastructure is also proposed at Aberdeen harbour’s Nigg Bay development.

“While this development is of a much larger scale than the options outlined for Macduff harbour, such a substantial development is likely to have an impact on level of demand, at all levels.

Mr McKay added: “The impacts of these developments on the wider market for port services would have to form an integral part of any assessment into the potential benefits of further investment at Macduff harbour.”

It is understood that council chiefs see both Macduff upgrade options as “technically feasible”, and a combination of the options is a possibility.

However, a business case would need to be worked up to demonstrate the scheme’s economic viability.

With budgets tight at Woodhill House, it is unlikely the bulk of the work would be paid for from council coffers. Instead the authority could apply for Lottery and European grant funding.

Members of the Banff and Buchan area committee have been asked to authorise a further £25,000 study into the need for development in Macduff.

The councillors are expected to back the proposal when they meet on Tuesday.