Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Sheriff highly critical of Aberdeen deputy council leader and police

Marie Boulton, deputy leader of the Aberdeen City Council
Marie Boulton, deputy leader of the Aberdeen City Council

A north-east sheriff has strongly criticised a senior Aberdeen councillor and the approach taken by police in a taxi licensing dispute.

Sheriff Malcolm Garden was scathing in his assessment of deputy city council leader Marie Boulton in a court judgement published yesterday.

He further criticised the way in which police handled their submission to the local authority’s licensing committee in the legal dispute.

The sheriff’s ruling concerned an appeal from a former cab driver from Aberdeen, Varinder Sood, who was contesting a decision by the committee to refuse to renew his taxi driver’s licence.

Mr Sood’s application was originally knocked back in June 2012, and he lost a subsequent appeal in February 2013.

However, Mr Sood submitted a fresh bid later last year, which was again refused.

In his judgement on the latest appeal heard on August 20, Sheriff Garden found that the committee acted properly in refusing the application.

But he took issue with evidence presented by Mrs Boulton, who is also convener of the city’s licensing board.

Sheriff Garden described the submissions from other councillors on the committee, and from legal officials at the local authority, as “consistent, credible and reliable”.

In contrast, he rejected Mrs Boulton’s contribution.

He said: “It is a matter of concern that a senior councillor should apparently have such a poor recollection of what is a quasi-judicial process or should have misunderstood the proceedings before her to such a marked extent. I will comment no further.”

On the police, who had submitted the same letter of objection to Mr Sood’s first application as on the second. Sheriff Garden said: “The impression is that they could not be bothered to formulate an appropriately worded document.

“Given that they are fully aware this is a submission to a lay committee, I find this to be irresponsible and highly disrespectful to all concerned.”

Last night, Mrs Boulton said she was “bemused” at the comments from the sheriff. She added: “I supported the committee in its decision to refuse the application – I felt due process had been followed.”

Fraser Forsyth, convener of the licensing committee, said he was “reassured” the sheriff had backed the committee’s ruling.

Mr Forsyth also defended the input at committee meetings from police, who he said “are always extremely well prepared.”