Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Probe into Stonehaven rail disaster will look at storm and structure of the earth

Post Thumbnail

A rail expert has revealed that the structure of the earth will form part of the investigations.

The derailment – which left three people, including the train’s driver and conductor, dead – is believed to have been caused by a landslide.

Following the incident on Wednesday morning, an inquiry has been launched – and Network Rail have been told to report to Westminster transport chief Grant Shapps by September 1.

Much of the investigation is likely to focus on what role Tuesday night’s stormy weather played – and Scottish Government transport secretary Michael Matheson has already revealed it had an impact.

Ali Chegini, the director of system safety and health at the Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB), said: “We know earth structures, such as embankments or cuttings which are ageing, have been deteriorating quite significantly with adverse weather conditions. We have seen a particular uptick in the failure of these, especially cuttings, during severe weather events.

“They have generally resulted in very quick failures, particularly when those events have followed a period of dry activity.

“Network Rail is acutely aware of the sensitivity of these structures and the risks they pose, and has been implementing a programme of monitoring and inspection.

“However, we have 10,000 miles of railway and 20,000 miles of track in this country. There’s also 190,000 earth structures, so there is a huge volume of work to monitor and improve all these.

“If it turns out this is a failure of an earth structure, the question that has to be asked is how we can spot these early enough to make sure this doesn’t happen, or make sure trains aren’t in the area when they do.

“It requires very thorough constant vigilance and monitoring.”

Meanwhile Kevin Smith, the editor-in-chief of the International Railway Journal (IRJ), said the incident would be likely to bring about improvements.

He said: “Such incidents are really rare – it’s been nearly 13 years since the last such fatality in Britain.

“Network Rail also has a very proud safety record and there is a culture of safety embedded throughout the organisation, for example, through its Home Safe plan.

“Andrew Haines’ comments about increasing inspections at dozens of sites with similar conditions as a precaution is a sensible response.

“I also think this emphasises the challenge Network Rail faces of protecting and maintaining 15,000+km of railway infrastructure across the country.

“On the whole they do a good job, which is emphasised by how rare these type of events are.”