Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘Complex legal issues’ result in collapse of trial for man accused of cheating elderly

Stephen Hughes​ at Inverness Sheriff Court.
Stephen Hughes​ at Inverness Sheriff Court.

A Glasgow businessman accused of cheating pensioners out of thousands of pounds for renewable heating systems which were never supplied walked free from the dock yesterday.

For the past two weeks, 38-year-old Stephen Hughes of Haylynn Street, has been on trial at Inverness Sheriff Court, facing 63 charges of dishonesty and Trading Standards offences.

But after two days of legal argument, Sheriff Margaret Neilson ruled that only five charges of failing to inform customers of their cancellation rights should be put to the jury.

However, fiscal depute Roderick Urquhart told the court he was withdrawing those charges as they would never be put to a jury if they stood alone.

During the trial, Mr Urquhart dropped and amended some of the charges in a bid to rescue the prosecution. He also conceded that some of the charges had “not been happily drafted.”

At the end of the evidence, he then tried to amend more of the charges but Sheriff Neilson rejected his motion, saying it was too late and could be prejudicial to Hughes.

Defence counsel Paul Nelson had by then put a complex “no case to answer” argument to the Sheriff, saying there was insufficient evidence against his client.


>> Keep up to date with the latest news with The P&J newsletter


He told the Sheriff there was nothing in the Crown case which proved that there was criminal intent, that Hughes knew the systems would not be installed or that he did not intend to supply them.

Mr Nelson successfully argued that there was no evidence of the non-availability of Government grants or that they were contingent upon the payment of deposits.

Witnesses told the trial that around £30,000 of deposits had been paid by them but no goods received.

They also accused Hughes of misleading them about the availability of Government grants, which turned out to be loans.

Sheriff Neilson explained to the jury that it had ended because of complex legal issues and made no criticism of the “credibility and reliability of the witnesses”.

Mr Urquhart told the court: “The common law charges had not been happily drafted and I belatedly tried to amend them to what they probably should have said.”

He apologised to the jury and the witnesses for the amount of time they had devoted to the trial and that their expectations had not been met.

A Crown Office spokesman said: “As with any case, the decision to prosecute was taken after full and careful consideration of all the facts and circumstances and the evidence available at that time.

“After a no case to answer submission was upheld in relation to the majority of the charges against the accused, the Crown reviewed the remaining charges and decided to discontinue proceedings”.